Originally posted by Wanderer
View Post
The agency have NOTHING in writing to say that the contractor accepted that variation to the contract terms and they would be laughed out of court if they ever tried to defend themselves on that basis.
The contractor does not risk perjury because they would not make false statement. Their lawyer simply points out that the burden of proof is on the agency. If they can't prove that the contractor company has both received and accepted the variation in contract terms then the agency lose.
The contractor does not risk perjury because they would not make false statement. Their lawyer simply points out that the burden of proof is on the agency. If they can't prove that the contractor company has both received and accepted the variation in contract terms then the agency lose.
WTF does everyone here seem to think we should just
and take it when agencies try to screw us? Do you people have no business sense at all? Agencies must think it's hilarious.
and take it when agencies try to screw us? Do you people have no business sense at all? Agencies must think it's hilarious.




Comment