Originally posted by thunderlizard
View Post
Before discussing the rate, why won't the client won't deal via the agency? Does the manager who wants to go direct have this "idea" sanctioned by HR? Is it there a problem with that specific agency or is it a change in company policy? The latter means their contractor resource pool has suddenly become restricted to probably just you and a handful of others!
When I've been approached about going direct I've let the client know I'm equally happy to work either via either route and that it's their call to make, and that I won't let on to the agent about the possibility of work. But if they insist on the agency route (and they usually do) then I'll make my rate negotiations with the agency thank you.
Middle-ranking PMs/team-leads often have an overinflated idea of the agency's margin and so overestimate the potential savings to their project by going direct with the contractor. As much as it pains me I reckon there can sometimes be a better chance of a rate increase (and less chance of damaging the client relationship) by staying with and squeezing the agent.
Comment