Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Swiss bank accounts reporting
Collapse
X
-
-
Yep, and of course one effect of the German ruling is that it effectively legalises the data for the rest of the EU. Stolen CD goes into German tax database, other countries like Britain then request a data set from Germany's tax records and the whole sordid story is complete. When it comes to tax and an indebted government, you have no rights.Originally posted by proggy View PostYou are aware that different countries have different laws aren't you?
Unless of course some exceedingly wealthy individual takes the government to court over this and wins, which I would dearly like to see, but I can't imagine any mere mortal that's subject to UK taxes being able to fund the legal cases unless he has more income than the British or German government. But if someone does, then for what it's worth I'll happily buy him a pint.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 27 May 2013, 09:01.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
Given this CD was stolen in 2088 and no-one from the UK has been prosecuted using the evidence I doubt it will happen in the UK.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYep, and of course one effect of the German ruling is that it effectively legalises the data for the rest of the EU. Stolen CD goes into German tax database, other countries like Britain then request a data set from Germany's tax records and the whole sordid story is complete. When it comes to tax and an indebted government, you have no rights.
Unless of course some exceedingly wealthy individual takes the government to court over this and wins, but I can't imagine any mere mortal being able to fund the legal cases unless he has more income than the British or German government.
Plenty people have taken HMRC to court and won, what are you going on about?Comment
-
Comment
-
Not yet, maybe. You might beat HMRC in court if it's about a puny amount of money as they'll just give up.Originally posted by proggy View PostGiven this CD was stolen in 2088 and no-one from the UK has been prosecuted using the evidence I doubt it will happen in the UK.
Plenty people have taken HMRC to court and won, what are you going on about?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
A lot. The Swiss have to and over details of 500 account holders every year as requested by HM Thieving Bastards Department. How to the British authorities know which account details to name in their request? Well, among other sources, from data extracts from other governments.Originally posted by proggy View PostYeah, but whats that got do do with stolen evidence? That is a legal agreement between the governments.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
The point is that since January 2013, the Swiss authorities automatically deduct at the highest tax rates and transfer the money to HMRC so there´s no point, and if the UK the authorities did get an illegal CD then they can legally request details of the bank account from the Swiss bank and get them, as well, in case there was even more they can tax or penalise.I'm alright JackComment
-
I suppose you could stick some valuables in a Swiss bank vault and hope they rise in value.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe point is that since January 2013, the Swiss authorities automatically deduct at the highest tax rates so there´s no point, and if the UK the authorities did get an illegal CD then they can legally request details of the bank account from the Swiss bank and get them.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Er, they dont need stolen evidence, perhaps?Originally posted by proggy View PostYeah, but whats that got do do with stolen evidence? That is a legal agreement between the governments.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Today 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41

Comment