Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Swiss bank accounts reporting
Collapse
X
-
-
Yep, and of course one effect of the German ruling is that it effectively legalises the data for the rest of the EU. Stolen CD goes into German tax database, other countries like Britain then request a data set from Germany's tax records and the whole sordid story is complete. When it comes to tax and an indebted government, you have no rights.Originally posted by proggy View PostYou are aware that different countries have different laws aren't you?
Unless of course some exceedingly wealthy individual takes the government to court over this and wins, which I would dearly like to see, but I can't imagine any mere mortal that's subject to UK taxes being able to fund the legal cases unless he has more income than the British or German government. But if someone does, then for what it's worth I'll happily buy him a pint.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 27 May 2013, 09:01.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Comment
-
Given this CD was stolen in 2088 and no-one from the UK has been prosecuted using the evidence I doubt it will happen in the UK.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYep, and of course one effect of the German ruling is that it effectively legalises the data for the rest of the EU. Stolen CD goes into German tax database, other countries like Britain then request a data set from Germany's tax records and the whole sordid story is complete. When it comes to tax and an indebted government, you have no rights.
Unless of course some exceedingly wealthy individual takes the government to court over this and wins, but I can't imagine any mere mortal being able to fund the legal cases unless he has more income than the British or German government.
Plenty people have taken HMRC to court and won, what are you going on about?Comment
-
Comment
-
Not yet, maybe. You might beat HMRC in court if it's about a puny amount of money as they'll just give up.Originally posted by proggy View PostGiven this CD was stolen in 2088 and no-one from the UK has been prosecuted using the evidence I doubt it will happen in the UK.
Plenty people have taken HMRC to court and won, what are you going on about?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
A lot. The Swiss have to and over details of 500 account holders every year as requested by HM Thieving Bastards Department. How to the British authorities know which account details to name in their request? Well, among other sources, from data extracts from other governments.Originally posted by proggy View PostYeah, but whats that got do do with stolen evidence? That is a legal agreement between the governments.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
The point is that since January 2013, the Swiss authorities automatically deduct at the highest tax rates and transfer the money to HMRC so there´s no point, and if the UK the authorities did get an illegal CD then they can legally request details of the bank account from the Swiss bank and get them, as well, in case there was even more they can tax or penalise.I'm alright JackComment
-
I suppose you could stick some valuables in a Swiss bank vault and hope they rise in value.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe point is that since January 2013, the Swiss authorities automatically deduct at the highest tax rates so there´s no point, and if the UK the authorities did get an illegal CD then they can legally request details of the bank account from the Swiss bank and get them.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Er, they dont need stolen evidence, perhaps?Originally posted by proggy View PostYeah, but whats that got do do with stolen evidence? That is a legal agreement between the governments.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Yesterday 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50
- “I’m not a Machiavellian overlord”: Adrian Sacco breaks his silence on the Contractor Loan Recalls Aug 13 06:50

Comment