• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

No explicit termination clause mentioned for me where as consultancy can terminate me

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by formant View Post
    I was thinking (hoping?) the OP meant that when he gives notice the agency will withold payment for work done up to the point at which he leaves.
    Possibly but whichever he means he is still showing naivety which he needs to get clear up before he goes any further. If you are right the he needs to get his head around the fact that agent's don't trick you in to them not having to pay. There is no 'trick'. He then also needs to understand his Opt In / Opt Out status (which is in a sticky at the top of this forum if the OP is reading).
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #12
      I'm beginning to think it's 2001 again...

      It's a good thing, if you can accept the commercial disadvantage: it means you are there to deliver a set piece of work, plus employees have to have a notice of termination period so if you haven't then you can't be an employee, disguised or otherwise.

      But hey, if you want to think like a permie then fine. Just don't compalin to the rest of us.
      Blog? What blog...?

      Comment


        #13
        QDOS guidance says avoid termination period if possible, but if there has to be one, ensure it is equal on both parties.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          I'm beginning to think it's 2001 again...

          It's a good thing, if you can accept the commercial disadvantage: it means you are there to deliver a set piece of work, plus employees have to have a notice of termination period so if you haven't then you can't be an employee, disguised or otherwise.

          But hey, if you want to think like a permie then fine. Just don't compalin to the rest of us.
          I don't think you are quite right in this context Mal. I know you hate arguing about it but having NO notice period is good. i.e. the client can bin you with no notice and you can't give them any is the best situation. In this case the client has notice period so the whole business advantage argument is ruined and can lead to other IR35 issues such as 'gardening leave'. We have seen how many people come on here expecting to get paid their notice period even if they don't do any work.

          A good example is MBF V HMRC. Reading the summaries the key to his win was a total lack of notice either way as per the comment below.

          MBF Design Services Limited vs HMRC: IR35 is why it pays to have no notice period :: Contractor UK

          However the subsequent judgement, in MBF Vs the Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs, overturned the lower court’s ruling, following an appeal by Mr Fitzpatrick. Potentially important to contractors in a similar contractual chain, the judgement indicates that a right by the employer/end-user to ‘terminate without notice’ is likely to have a significant bearing on the applicability of IR35.

          Because although Tribunal Judge Malachy Cornwell-Kelly agreed that much of the Mr Fitzpatrick’s terms were ambiguous and could be treated as creating either an employee or contractor relationship, Airbus’ right to terminate the contract without giving either notice or compensation was among the determining factors of his contract status.
          It is quite easy to see in this case how, what Mal says, is quite correct, having no notice is good for IR35.. But this is only if it doesn't exist for either party.

          With the OP the client can give him 14 days so the whole 'no notice period' argument will fail. Whether he himself has a notice period or not is pretty irrelavant now IMO.
          Last edited by northernladuk; 24 January 2013, 18:16.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #15
            Just to say, when B&C have reviewed my contracts, they have stated that having a resignation clause is what 'permanent' workers have and, in their considered opinion, is a weak pointer towards IR35.

            Myself, I prefer reciprical termination clause just in case you need to bail. Although agencies say they will 'negotiate' anyone needing to end a contract early, I've no doubt this will be on their terms and not mutually beneficial ones.

            Again, people need to read and understand the contract before accepting. The OP is yet another example of those people who do not them come running onto the forum with a query. FFS sort it out!
            I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by moggy View Post
              nothing in the questions

              have to be honest haven't seen one for a few months, nor can i remember the case studies though.
              Sorry - misphrased my comment. You are right in that there is nothing in the questions.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                We have seen how many people come on here expecting to get paid their notice period even if they don't do any work.
                A supplier being paid a notice period and doing no work because a client decides to end a contract early is a penalty clause.

                I know people who have put them in building contracts as well as other business contracts.

                One of my previous clients worked out it was cheaper to pay one of their suppliers, a consultancy, to do nothing for a month than to let them and their staff touch any work as the client's lawyers fees would have been more expensive.
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                  A supplier being paid a notice period and doing no work because a client decides to end a contract early is a penalty clause.

                  I know people who have put them in building contracts as well as other business contracts.

                  One of my previous clients worked out it was cheaper to pay one of their suppliers, a consultancy, to do nothing for a month than to let them and their staff touch any work as the client's lawyers fees would have been more expensive.
                  It isn't unless it is documented as such. If it isn't documented but expected by either party it starts messing about with your MoO and becomes an IR35 problem. It is only a clause if it is documented as such... and we don't tend to have this documented.
                  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Hi all

                    I'm digging up this old thread because I have a similar situation with a little tweak.

                    In the notice period section, the contract says:

                    Notice Period
                    Contractor Notice Period:
                    Client Notice Period:

                    Both fields were left blank. So the contract mentions the notice period but with nothing written. Does it mean my notice period is 0 (days/weeks/whatever) and can leave whenever I want?


                    In another section of the contract it says

                    Standard hours in normal working week: 0.00
                    Fee Per Hour: £x

                    Does it mean that I could potentially leave at anytime and start another job immediately without breaching my previous contract because the contract says I "have to commit" for 0 hours a week?

                    Thanks

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by MattZani View Post
                      Hi all

                      I'm digging up this old thread because I have a similar situation with a little tweak.

                      In the notice period section, the contract says:

                      Notice Period
                      Contractor Notice Period:
                      Client Notice Period:

                      Both fields were left blank. So the contract mentions the notice period but with nothing written. Does it mean my notice period is 0 (days/weeks/whatever) and can leave whenever I want?


                      In another section of the contract it says

                      Standard hours in normal working week: 0.00
                      Fee Per Hour: £x

                      Does it mean that I could potentially leave at anytime and start another job immediately without breaching my previous contract because the contract says I "have to commit" for 0 hours a week?

                      Thanks
                      Do you not think if it's left blank it's more likely someone hasn't filled it in? Why not speak to the agent and ask them? Further backed up with the 0.00 hours working week.

                      You have to apply a bit of common sense sometimes you know. It'd a hardship but has to be done sometimes
                      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X