Originally posted by acontractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Three month NHS gig
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by acontractor View PostJust spoken to my solicitor and he has advised that if you are getting 220 pd or more then weather or not you work for six months, you still be subject to scrutiny from HMRC.Comment
-
There's a couple of bits in here https://update.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/...Appointees.pdf which would seem to suggest that the 6 months applies to the time spent under the jurisdiction of a particular department within the public sectorComment
-
Originally posted by BA to the Stars View PostIs he a contractor specialist? You may be better discussing with PCG if you are a member (& before Mal gets in, if not, why not).
If this is true then no body in their right mind will take any NHS contract paying more then 200 pd isn't it ?!.. Mad!!Comment
-
Originally posted by acontractor View Postno body in their right mind will take any NHS contract paying more then 200 pd isn't it ?!.. Mad!!Comment
-
Originally posted by acontractor View PostIf this is true then no body in their right mind will take any NHS contract paying more then 200 pd isn't it ?!.. Mad!!
Needless to say I politely declined.Comment
-
Originally posted by bluetoaster View PostI would if rates were high enough to offset the risk, but from what I see NHS rates are dropping. I got a call today from an agent with an urgent requirement for for 5 PMs with NHS experience paying an almighty £250/day.
Needless to say I politely declined.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostYou could have offered to do all 5 for them for £1k a day so saving the project money and providing a better service.Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostEach contract is judged separately so this should not be an issue.
Originally posted by acontractor View PostJust spoken to my solicitor and he has advised that if you are getting 220 pd or more then weather or not you work for six months, you still be subject to scrutiny from HMRC.
Some Departments and PS clients are implementing the £220pd and 6 months from day one, others are waiting until you are up for renewal and will ask for proof of scoring via hmrc's test or similar assessment.
One insurance provider here reckons they have a product to cover this eventuality but Im far from convinced some of their products are worth the paper they are written on.
IMO, taking a public sector contract just isnt worth the risk of hmrc intervention at some point in the contract whether the contract be 3 months or 6 months. So, Im telling any agent who contacts me about such roles that Im not interested due to HMG's \ hmrc's 'off payroll' nonsense.
But, you pays yer money..........................I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostNo it's not. It is with the client in these cases.
Some Departments and PS clients are implementing the £220pd and 6 months from .... others are waiting until you are up for renewal and will ask for proof of scoring via hmrc's test or similar assessment.
Is that also where contract length is six months or more?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment