Originally posted by oracleslave
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Llloyds Banking Group - Cuts
Collapse
X
-
-
Much Bobs = short-term bottom-line looks cheaper. Board pays itself large bonus and is happy, shareholders eventually become unhappy, Bob is useless. Contractors eventually drafted in to fix bob-a-job mess; contractors are happy.Originally posted by tractor View PostMuch Bobs = cheaper. Board is happy, shareholders is happy, Bob is happy
Fixed.
nomadd liked this postComment
-
I also think that this promotion of BoBs and complaints about shortages of skilled IT workers in the UK is nothing more but a cheap propaganda targeted at people with remote view of the actual operations of the bank.Much Bobs = cheaper. Board is happy, shareholders is happy, Bob is happy.
What does surprise me is that the inevitable nuclear accident has not yet happened.
Not sure who is standing behind this - the likes of R*n Ta* would be the obvious candidates but who knows who else is involved in this sham.
Blatant massaging of the benefit realization analysis will be the last step in this charade.
IMO, when the inevitable nuclear accident happens, the people whose decisions led to the advent of BoBs in the UK will be rich and retired in Caribbean.Last edited by mos; 20 March 2012, 12:34.If UKIP are the answer, then it must have been a very stupid question.Comment
-
..
Precisely, I spent some time on a multi year programme once where the PM changed every 6 months, so did the programme direction and by the time anything could possibly fail, it had been binned and the focus was on the next workstream.Originally posted by mos View PostI also think that this promotion of BoBs and complaints about shortages of skilled IT workers in the UK is nothing more but a cheap propaganda targeted at people with remote view of the actual operations of the bank.
Not sure who is standing behind this - the likes of R*n Ta* would be the obvious candidates but who knows who else is involved in this sham.
Blatant massaging of the benefit realization analysis will be the last step in this charade.
IMO, when the inevitable nuclear accident happens, the people whose decisions led to the advent of BoBs in the UK will be rich and retired in Caribbean.
And so it goes on...Comment
-
....
Shareholders eventually become the tax paying public.Originally posted by nomadd View PostMuch Bobs = short-term bottom-line looks cheaper. Board pays itself large bonus and is happy, shareholders eventually become unhappy, Bob is useless. Contractors eventually drafted in to fix bob-a-job mess; contractors are happy.
Fixed.
Much fixedness for you...Comment
-
Tax-paying public?Originally posted by tractor View PostShareholders eventually become the tax paying public.
Much fixedness for you...
Why should you care - you're a tax-dodging contractor, aren't you?
Mucho-mucho fixedness for you!
nomadd liked this postComment
-
...
I guess you saw through me....but atm I appear to be a contract dodger and have been for some while grrrOriginally posted by nomadd View PostTax-paying public?
Why should you care - you're a tax-dodging contractor, aren't you?
Mucho-mucho fixedness for you!
Comment
-
If you count credit card details being sold for as little as 2p by bank staff it already hasOriginally posted by tractor View PostWhat does surprise me is that the inevitable nuclear accident has not yet happened.Doing the needful since 1827Comment
-
There appears to be an 'N' missing from the thread title...When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
Finally got rid of you eh? Took their time finding you out?Originally posted by TestMangler View PostThere appears to be an 'N' missing from the thread title...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Comment