Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Wierd. I work with 2 people, 1 has just started at Halifax this week, the other starts on Monday, both on 12 month contracts and no mention of rate cuts.
They've both said their rate at LTSB is better than current (which is towards top end for the location).
This sort of offshoring happens all the time. I have a lot of experience with it and with dealing with the offshore teams. What I can never figure out is why the bean counters think it is cheeper. The standard ratio I have seen used is you need 5 offshore guys to sort of replace 1 onshore guy (even if that onshore guy used to be offshore).
There are numerous quality problems, communication problems, time zone problems and so on. Especially now as the turnover in offshore companies is so high due to competition for the "best" people. During a 3 month period with a team of 20 people needed recently, the offshore supplier actually moved people in and out all the time and I ended up with a list of 120 people on the core team of 20 (not all at the same time obviously).
How this impacts Lloyds Banking Group and the availability of contracts for UK suppliers I cannot comment on except to say I am in negotiations at the moment to provide Solution and Integration Architecture consultancy.
How this impacts Lloyds Banking Group and the availability of contracts for UK suppliers I cannot comment on except to say I am in negotiations at the moment to provide Solution and Integration Architecture consultancy.
Likewise...
Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!
This sort of offshoring happens all the time. I have a lot of experience with it and with dealing with the offshore teams. What I can never figure out is why the bean counters think it is cheeper. The standard ratio I have seen used is you need 5 offshore guys to sort of replace 1 onshore guy (even if that onshore guy used to be offshore).
There are numerous quality problems, communication problems, time zone problems and so on. Especially now as the turnover in offshore companies is so high due to competition for the "best" people. During a 3 month period with a team of 20 people needed recently, the offshore supplier actually moved people in and out all the time and I ended up with a list of 120 people on the core team of 20 (not all at the same time obviously).
How this impacts Lloyds Banking Group and the availability of contracts for UK suppliers I cannot comment on except to say I am in negotiations at the moment to provide Solution and Integration Architecture consultancy.
It doesn't have to be cheaper. It just has to be spun as cheaper. Even when the much cheapness reduces the QoS muchly, it doesn't matter because banks don't care about their QoS to the retail market particularly.
Much Bobs = cheaper. Board is happy, shareholders is happy, Bob is happy.
What does surprise me is that the inevitable nuclear accident has not yet happened.
Comment