Originally posted by interested
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Accenture?
Collapse
X
-
Not quite, as I recall the split happened because AA had more partners, but AC made (much) more money. The AC partners decided to split because they didn't like sharing their profits with the AA people, who always got the top jobs in the parent organisation (Andersen Worldwide). AA went into consulting themselves, albeit on a smaller scale and often in niche areas like HR (or Human Capital as they called it).His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain... -
Yes, I think you're right. The original agreement was that whoever made the most profit, had to pay the other party 15%. AC did that more or less every year and eventually got fed up with it. Then when AA went back into consulting, AC got really fed up and that's when they went to court.Originally posted by MordacNot quite, as I recall the split happened because AA had more partners, but AC made (much) more money. The AC partners decided to split because they didn't like sharing their profits with the AA people, who always got the top jobs in the parent organisation (Andersen Worldwide). AA went into consulting themselves, albeit on a smaller scale and often in niche areas like HR (or Human Capital as they called it).Comment
-
I know people at both Warwick and Newcastle.Originally posted by andygIs this based in Warwick?
See you, you ****. I'll cut you first...
Comment
-
-
I have worked as a Permie for Accenture and to be honest they are no better or worse than any other big IT company I have worked for in the past, good rates and working conditions, admin can be a bit of a nightmare but on the whole ok, they pay up to contractors no questions asked and do expect their pound of flesh.
3 months is the standard contract length they offer.Comment
-
lol , hit the nail on the head. I'm currently a permie with them but looking to hand in resignation this week due to all the above. My only concern is due to working as a consultant for 7 years (2yrs CSC, 3 years small consulantcy, 2 Accenture) my skills/industry experience are a bit too varied for contract work with good rates. This is mainly due to JFDI mentality of consultancy.Originally posted by Mustang* Work long hours
* Spend a lot of time on clients sites - meaning away from home and in hotels
* Only get taught how to use Excel and Powerpoint (advanced level)
* Have to have an endless supply of double cuffed shirts and cufflinks
* Need to sound as if you come from public school
* Need to operate in JFDI mode all the time
* Openly discuss hotel bonus points and airmiles at lunch
Is this a real problem or just me worrying?Comment
-
3 months contracts are becoming the norm for IT consultancies at the moment - it's this Agile development fad that's doing the rounds. Privateeye calls it (fr)Agile, which sums it up really..."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Sums it up really. I've seen most of the big ones (ooh snigger, matron) in action and they are all much of a muchness (i.e. mostly crap, some - Crap Gemini & Atos for example - crapper than others). EDS is the only one I've never had direct involvement with (I took avoidance measures from an early stage) however I know enough people who have to know they'd be on the "most crappest" list. Accidenture (for that is really their name) are better than most at extracting excess cash from their clients and themselves from litigation. Allegedly. If you have to, you have to. I wouldn't bother, the talent pool starts to get very shallow at the rates they tend to pay.Originally posted by stan2484I have worked as a Permie for Accenture and to be honest they are no better or worse than any other big IT company I have worked for in the past, .His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Well the first week went well. No problems, long hours, very switched on Project Manager, some switched off consultants. Not too bad really. Hours were very long though.
The rate is excellent and the client is prestigious and appears very happy with Accenture. I have no problems with it on my CV.Comment
-
They might be happy now...Originally posted by oxtailsoupthe client is prestigious and appears very happy with Accenture.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment