Originally posted by lindsay~
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agent won't take out dodgy clause in Contract
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by escapeUK; 22 April 2010, 19:15. -
Don't agencies have insurance to cover them for non-paying clients? Or does this not exist?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by lindsay~ View PostJust about to start a contract and had questioned a clause in the contract which states:
“The Company shall not be obliged to pay any fees to the Contractor unless the Company has received, in cleared funds, the sums due from the Client in respect of the timesheet"
Agent says they've never exercised it but it's to cover them if a client goes bust! They are refusing to remove it...
If I am opted in (no opt out request signed prior to introduction to Client) and I sign this contract with this clause in it, am I agreeing to opt out of this element of the regulations OR it is simply illegal for the Agent to have this clause in the agreement?
They are refusing to supply Company Accounts to me also, saying if I want them I can go to Companies House. Nice and friendly aren't they? Or perhaps they've got something to hide?
Thoughts or advice?
I just want to start work but the Agent is making me think I should be running for hills
2 - Make sure that you have PCG Plus membership in case they go bust.
3 - Consider whether it's worth the hassle - only you know what the market is like for your skills, how much you need the work etc.
4 - If you are opted in, then it's a moot point - weigh up whether you want the argument now, or in the future (if it comes to that).
Sounds like a ridiculous clause to me - if I have to work through an agency, then I expect them to take some risk for their money, rather than put ALL the risk on me.If you have to add a , it isn't funny. HTH. LOL.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment