• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

should I go for it?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25 View Post
    Yes because many a time Ive been turned down for a role because on my answer sheet I wrote dont instead of don't.

    If you are writing a SQL query where you are filtering with a group by clause, and can't spell HAVING, it isn't going to work, is it?
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      If you are writing a SQL query where you are filtering with a group by clause, and can't spell HAVING, it isn't going to work, is it?
      OK. Let me put it this way for you. Do you wear a 3 piece tuxedo to every party you ever go to? Or do you wear one for formal occasions and then something a little more casual for the less formal parties?

      I assume you do so .........

      Sometimes, people treat their use of the English language with different levels of formality depending on the situation.

      For instance, if Im writing SQL, I might be fairly formal about it. If I was writing a letter of application for a job I might be formal about it.

      If I'm writing a flippant message to you, Im going to be pretty casual about it.

      Now if the respondent had written some SQL code for you in his post that wasnt correct, you may have a point, however he didnt which renders your point null and void.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25 View Post
        Now if the respondent had written some SQL code for you in his post that wasnt correct, you may have a point, however he didnt which renders your point null and void.
        Thanks for the support "NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25".
        If I could't write a proper SQL , I would have been in the Market more often. But anyway that was not the point, Thanks again for all your time.

        Cheers
        Nandoo

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by kknandoo View Post
          Hi guys,


          But I know am not ready for this, as with my skills ( oracle BIEE, data warehousing, etl etc.) I can get much better rate (atleast another £50 - £75 per day) if I go out.

          nandoo
          If you are any good, with serious DW skills, minimum £400 in this market, 450 to 550 in better times.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
            I would suggest that if you are unable to spell "have", "been", "don't" or "isn't" correctly, your chances of securing a higher paying role may be slim.
            If someone's bashing out very quick forum posts whilst multi-tasking, what is the point in harassing them about it?

            Anyway, given apostrophes are also used to denote 1 or more missing alpha characters, do't is actually acceptable, if a little queer.

            I guess you've got to keep that ridiculous daily post count up though

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25 View Post
              If I'm writing a flippant message to you, Im going to be pretty casual about it.

              Now if the respondent had written some SQL code for you in his post that wasnt correct, you may have a point, however he didnt which renders your point null and void.
              "Null and void" is a legal expression with a precise meaning. Aw, what the hell!
              Step outside posh boy

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by larson View Post
                If someone's bashing out very quick forum posts whilst multi-tasking, what is the point in harassing them about it?
                Because it's important to get things right - I deal with a number of different non-native English users on my website. If they (or anyone) starts using txt spk, it becomes incredibly difficult for others to understand what they are trying to say. It is also hard for those with any form of reading problem / illness to get to grips with what people are saying - the harder you make it to understand, the less likely you are to receive meaningful, intelligent responses.

                There is a difference between a typo and deliberately abbreviating "have" and "been" to "hv" and "bn".

                Originally posted by larson View Post
                do't is actually acceptable, if a little queer.
                No, it isn't. If that were true, people would use "d't" for "don't" although that might get confusing when people take it further, e.g. "I d't get a d't store"

                Originally posted by larson View Post
                I guess you've got to keep that ridiculous daily post count up though
                If that's aimed at me, I hardly count an average of under 8 posts a day as "ridiculous"
                Best Forum Advisor 2014
                Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                Comment


                  #18
                  me we sd oy ue te ft ad lt ls of eh wd.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                    Because it's important to get things right - I deal with a number of different non-native English users on my website. If they (or anyone) starts using txt spk, it becomes incredibly difficult for others to understand what they are trying to say. It is also hard for those with any form of reading problem / illness to get to grips with what people are saying - the harder you make it to understand, the less likely you are to receive meaningful, intelligent responses.

                    No, it isn't. If that were true, people would use "d't" for "don't" although that might get confusing when people take it further, e.g. "I d't get a d't store"

                    If that's aimed at me, I hardly count an average of under 8 posts a day as "ridiculous"
                    My last comment was just tongue in cheek....although not literally, as the tongue rarely resides in the cheek.

                    As long as posts are understandable, given some of them are casual, the odd spelling mistake or typo is acceptable. Variety makes the world go round, so as long as things are generally of a high standard, the odd blip is ok by me.

                    Reminds me some what of the old newsgroup days in which top-posters and bottom-posters would argue about who was right to do what they did. Why bother taking sides on boring matters, when you can instead simply sip a pint

                    Comment


                      #20
                      go for it. bugger the naysayers. if you don't get out now you will be there for life. get some edge, get some variety. do it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X