Just received this email.
"Dear Contractor,
Further to the announcement of a rate reduction within ******* Group. The difficult decision has been taken to apply a rate reduction of 10%.
The rate reduction will take effect from Sunday 5th April 2009. Amended contracts are being created for all contractors and will be sent to you in due course. There is a significant amount of contracts to be re-raised however we anticipate you will receive this no later than Monday 16th March 2009. Please be aware that all pay related discussions should be held with your contractual partner and not a ******* Manager.
Contracts need to be returned to the appropriate party by close of business on Friday 27th March, We hope you appreciate the business decision that drives this and that you will accept the new terms being offered. If we have not received your contract by this date we will accept that you are providing 2 weeks notice of your intention to terminate your current contract."
So a blanket cut for everybody? - err no. actually a friend showed me a different email confirming that his rate will be maintained. As for myself, last week I was renewed for 3 months from 14th March at my current rate. I suspect I shouldn't have received this mail - the client is depending on me working 50hr weeks to meet a hard deadline.
But supposing I am caught by this - any suggestions? I'm wondering whether to shrug and say I'm going back to the relative sanity of 37.5hr weeks and they will have to find some other way to meet their deadline.
Or should I cave? I should I negotiate a smaller cut? The really annoying thing is that I worked nearly 2 years on a lower rate and only asked for, and got, a 9% higher rate at the end of September - which I put in writing as "Fixed until the end of 2009". Unfortunately they only verbally agreed to the fix. Under the law of contract thats still binding, but its irrelevant as I am certainly not going down the litigation path.
All observations welcome!
"Dear Contractor,
Further to the announcement of a rate reduction within ******* Group. The difficult decision has been taken to apply a rate reduction of 10%.
The rate reduction will take effect from Sunday 5th April 2009. Amended contracts are being created for all contractors and will be sent to you in due course. There is a significant amount of contracts to be re-raised however we anticipate you will receive this no later than Monday 16th March 2009. Please be aware that all pay related discussions should be held with your contractual partner and not a ******* Manager.
Contracts need to be returned to the appropriate party by close of business on Friday 27th March, We hope you appreciate the business decision that drives this and that you will accept the new terms being offered. If we have not received your contract by this date we will accept that you are providing 2 weeks notice of your intention to terminate your current contract."
So a blanket cut for everybody? - err no. actually a friend showed me a different email confirming that his rate will be maintained. As for myself, last week I was renewed for 3 months from 14th March at my current rate. I suspect I shouldn't have received this mail - the client is depending on me working 50hr weeks to meet a hard deadline.
But supposing I am caught by this - any suggestions? I'm wondering whether to shrug and say I'm going back to the relative sanity of 37.5hr weeks and they will have to find some other way to meet their deadline.
Or should I cave? I should I negotiate a smaller cut? The really annoying thing is that I worked nearly 2 years on a lower rate and only asked for, and got, a 9% higher rate at the end of September - which I put in writing as "Fixed until the end of 2009". Unfortunately they only verbally agreed to the fix. Under the law of contract thats still binding, but its irrelevant as I am certainly not going down the litigation path.
All observations welcome!
Comment