• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Can you be canned for being sick?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by blacjac View Post
    No it isn't.

    A Flu jab will only protect agianst the particular strains of flu that the government think will be most prevelant that year.....
    That's why you need a new jab each year. It works for me and the other contractors I know. If you had the jab, you would not have had flu and lost your money.
    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
      That's why you need a new jab each year. It works for me and the other contractors I know. If you had the jab, you would not have had flu and lost your money.
      The flu jab has its purposes. I have to take it, not because I am a contractor, but because I am diabetic. In the past few years since taking the jab, I have been lucky not to get the stronger strain of the Flu. Yes, there are a few strains out there, but all you are set to lose is £10 at your local pharmacist. If you don't take the jab and are unlucky to get the flu, you would lose a lot more. However, it's up to individual contractors to make the risk assessment and decide whether they need the jab or not. Personally, I think it is a bit late in the day to consider taking it now. It should have been done back in October / November.
      If your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.

      Comment


        #43
        Having worked in the pharmaceutical industry, I will only put things made by said industry in my body if I absolutely have to. Frankly, I would rather have 'flu.

        When the pharmaceutical industry comes under the same headlights as the financial sector currently is - and believe me, eventually it will - people are going to be scared to death.
        Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
          Having worked in the pharmaceutical industry, I will only put things made by said industry in my body if I absolutely have to. Frankly, I would rather have 'flu.

          When the pharmaceutical industry comes under the same headlights as the financial sector currently is - and believe me, eventually it will - people are going to be scared to death.

          http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile.../1229502460226

          Not forgetting that many people die from flu.
          "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by blacjac View Post
            No it isn't.

            A Flu jab will only protect agianst the particular strains of flu that the government think will be most prevelant that year.....
            Originally posted by Paddy View Post
            That's why you need a new jab each year. It works for me and the other contractors I know. If you had the jab, you would not have had flu and lost your money.

            I've had the jab every year for the last 6 years, I get it free as I am diabetic.

            Out of those 6 years I have had the flu in 3 of them.

            The point I was making was that you seem to think the flu jab is a 100% effective at preventing you catching the flu in any given year.
            However this simply is not the case as the government decides which strains of flu to inoculate against.
            Only a moron would trust the government on this....
            Still Invoicing

            Comment


              #46
              I get the flu jab most years : this is the first year I have had a cold in the same year I have had a flu jab.

              Comment


                #47

                'Flu (short for influenza - nothing like being pedantic is there ?)

                Actually, the 'flu jab isn't specified by the government, but by a more world wide organisation - WHO or somesuch.

                It's really only a concern in the very young and elderly, and those groups should have the jab. The rest of us should just grin and bear it. And lose a lot of money in the process like I did recently.

                As an ex-pharmacologist, I have to say that people these days are striving to be too germ-free (in a general sense). All this faffing about with kill this'n' that sprays makes us less tolerant to build our own defenses against infection naturally. Take a look at all the reactions that people have to everyday substances - people: we need a bit of dirt in our lives to promote our immune system.
                I grew up on a farm drinking unpasteurised milk and it never did me any harm. Oo-ar !

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by adestor View Post

                  'Flu (short for influenza - nothing like being pedantic is there ?)

                  Actually, the 'flu jab isn't specified by the government, but by a more world wide organisation - WHO or somesuch.

                  It's really only a concern in the very young and elderly, and those groups should have the jab. The rest of us should just grin and bear it. And lose a lot of money in the process like I did recently.

                  As an ex-pharmacologist, I have to say that people these days are striving to be too germ-free (in a general sense). All this faffing about with kill this'n' that sprays makes us less tolerant to build our own defenses against infection naturally. Take a look at all the reactions that people have to everyday substances - people: we need a bit of dirt in our lives to promote our immune system.
                  I grew up on a farm drinking unpasteurised milk and it never did me any harm. Oo-ar !
                  I totally agree with you on this one.

                  A wee bit of dirt does you good !


                  Mean Mr Mustard
                  Shaves in the dark - sleeps in the park - trying to save paper
                  Sleeps in a hole in the Road
                  Keeps a ten bob note up his Nose
                  Such a Mean Old Man
                  Such A Dirty Old Man

                  Comment


                    #49
                    I avoid human contact and thus have not contracted any airborne diseases. Invoicing capability for the last 3 years has remained steady at 100%.
                    Illegitimus non carborundum est!

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Flubster View Post
                      I avoid human contact and thus have not contracted any airborne diseases. Invoicing capability for the last 3 years has remained steady at 100%.
                      So do I. I only talk to the permie scum. well shout in fact.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X