Not really. Agencies aren't agencies at all, they're employment businesses. That means they are in business to source candidates for their clients, not find you work or market you to the company. If that were the case they would be agents, who you would be paying to do this.
The crazy thing about all of this is that we're still expected to fund out own interview expenses. The logic of this is stupid. If the hirer is using employment businesses to source candidates then we are doing the hirer a favour via the recruiter to put ourselves forward. So when we go for an interview, we're doing the hirer a favour by being there for them to select from, we're not there to find ourselves a job (even if we ourselves are looking for work). It seems logical, therefore, that the hirer should be prepared to pay all interview costs if a contractor requests it.
The crazy thing about all of this is that we're still expected to fund out own interview expenses. The logic of this is stupid. If the hirer is using employment businesses to source candidates then we are doing the hirer a favour via the recruiter to put ourselves forward. So when we go for an interview, we're doing the hirer a favour by being there for them to select from, we're not there to find ourselves a job (even if we ourselves are looking for work). It seems logical, therefore, that the hirer should be prepared to pay all interview costs if a contractor requests it.
Comment