If you wanted to work on your Plan B while still doing your normal work, is there a good reason to create a separate company for this? If your plan B was somewhat related to IT then would it make more sense to operate out of your existing Ltd? Are there tax/IR35 issues?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Multiple companies?
Collapse
X
-
Multiple companies?
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
This has been discussed before, and I think it was agreed that from a financial perspective there is no difference, althought you might have minor gains in single accountancy fees etc.
However, from a legal perspective, I would certainly keep Plan B seperate, so that any actions done as part of it (or your Co Ltd) do not affect one and other. Imagine Your Co is sued for example, do you want to take Plan B down with it? And should you wish to close Your CO to concentrate on Plan B, it makes things "cleaner" but thats only if you are a tidy person
TM -
IR35 relates to the contract you work on so there would be no impact here.
Tax can be affected positively or negatively if you put your plan b through your ltd co: If Plan B is loss generating then these losses can be set against consultancy profits so reducing the tax bill. If Plan B is going to be hugely profitable, then combining both in the one company could push you up into higher Corp Tax rates.
The most compelling reason, imo, for the use of a separate ltd co would be liability: Using two companies would effectively ring fence the assets of the individual businesses keeping them safe if the other fails.Comment
-
This is wrong. If you set up a newco, controlled by the same parties as oldco (which is the only conclusion you can draw from the OP), then the threshold at which the higher rate of corporation tax becomes payable is halved. So by setting up a second company you are more likely to pay more tax.Originally posted by Just1morethen View PostIf Plan B is going to be hugely profitable, then combining both in the one company could push you up into higher Corp Tax rates.Comment
-
Quite right, The Puma. Had a brain block there. Sorry.
You'd need to consider whether the Plan B turnover would push yuo beyond the Flat Rate Scheme threshold as well.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment