• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Umbrella Company Help Please!!!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Are you sure about that? IIRC there's different rules out in the media, and AV etc.
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    There are some different rules for television and films.

    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/specialist/fi..._notes2003.pdf

    Also there does appear to be some round sum allowances for subsistence.
    I stand corrected

    What have HMRC got against IT contractors anyway? Are they just cross with us because EDS keep on mucking up projects? That's not my fault...

    Comment


      #12
      Mostly they got cheesed off with so many of us totally taking the pi$$ by paying sod all NI and Tax on large incomes.

      In effect they had a sizable number of people to attack that would provide a nice rate of return.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
        Mostly they got cheesed off with so many of us totally taking the pi$$ by paying sod all NI and Tax on large incomes.

        In effect they had a sizable number of people to attack that would provide a nice rate of return.
        sod all NI

        We pay the same tax as anyone else.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
          What have HMRC got against IT contractors anyway?
          Actually nothing specific, except they see "leakage".

          Within the film industry everybody was self employed, claimed loads of expenses and paid sod all in the way of tax and NI.

          HMIT got fed up with this and went off on a couple of cases http://www.egos.co.uk/cases/HALL_v_Lorimer.htm and established a set of ground rules that basically assumed employment. These jolly naughty people then started forming companies, so they issued some new guidance to clamp down on that, had to have contracts with the service company which the engager had to establish were legal and binding otherwise they couldn't even pay the service company. Had to pay the worker directly through PAYE.

          So, when they'd done this they moved onto the debacle called the CIS.

          Then they realised they were still some naughty film people and builders who still weren't paying their share. So they cast the net a bit wider and dreamt up IR35 (they had of course figured out that IT was a large untapped market from them but IR35 is much wider than that).

          So hector hasn't got anything specific against IT contractors. He's got something against everybody who is not straight PAYE.

          I hope you feel equally victimised rather than unfairly victimised.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
            sod all NI

            We pay the same tax as anyone else.
            Indeed we do, but many of us take measures to avoid paying any more than the absolute minimum than we can legally get away with.

            The classic example being taking a miniscule salary and the rest as dividends which are treated differently for tax.

            Simplistic view...
            There used to be an awful lot of people in IT contracting who totally extracted the urine and IR and now HMRC have reacted.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
              ..The classic example being taking a miniscule salary and the rest as dividends which are treated differently for tax...
              That is an NI avoiding tactic far more than a tax minimisation strategy.

              If NI wasn't in the equation (both EENic and ERNic), there would be little difference between taking money as dividend income and money as salary.
              Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

              Comment


                #17
                From an agency side of things, Filetravel and Maxim Finance are both dreams to work with. On the (thankfully) rare occasions I c*ck up a timesheet both of these companies are able to pay direct to the contractor without any fuss and can normally do it same day without charge.

                Please take this at face value, as I have no idea what they charge to you guys, this is just an opinion based on the agency-limited co. working relationship.

                Giant are a pain in the backside to arrange TTs with

                Hevra

                Comment


                  #18
                  I personally have advised on Umbrella company structures prior to and post Managed service companies legislation.

                  The key to ensuring an umbrella company is fully compliant and suitable for your specific needs is to obtain specific information.

                  If a company, on their website etc, is marketing itself as a tax avoidance scheme it is likely to be picked up by HMRC and therefore likely not a good option for contractors long term.

                  Ask for sepcific information, a breakdown of how pay is calculated, a sample payslip, a sample contract of employment, details of the expenses policy, copy of the upper contract it has with its agency/client - and get them checked out!

                  As an aside, a word of warning regarding dispensations - many umbrella companies publicise the fact they have dispensations as giving individuals a blanket to claim untrue expesnes - it must be remembered that expenses claimed, if incorrect, are a personal liability to the individual. Dispensations merely dispense with the need for the umbrella company to produce P11Ds come year end - do not be duped by over-publicised dispensations on umbrella websites.

                  Many umbrella companies do operate legitimately and unfortunately they are being priced out of the market by those umbrellas who flout the legislation.

                  At the end of the day, if an umbrella company comes under attack by HMRC and is found to be operating incorrectly it is the individuals who suffer (be they open to personal liability or merely having the inconvenience of seeking another umbrella company) - Umbrella companies need to remember they are only profittable because of you guys, so it is you who must ensure they are opretating correctly.

                  Many umbrellas have had their structures and operation reviewed by professional advisers who are happy to confirm to individuals whether the structure is compliant with current legislation. Extra care should be taken with those who cannot offer such assurances.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X