Having now gained a couple of chunks of significant business through my website, I'm beginning to think that it's worth developing it further to include details of the clients I've worked for.
However, strictly speaking, although I've worked on solutions for furniture manufacturer X, breakfast cereal manufacturer Y and telecoms operator Z, none of these have been my direct clients. They've all been through either recruitment agencies or other intermediates who outsource the technical effort (e.g. new media companies).
So - how would I give readers of my website the impression that I'm responsible for the technical work on these solutions without upsetting the intermediate companies - not to mention the end clients who may be upset to find out that their solution was predominantly produced by a one-man organisation?
Or should I let it go and just advertise the intermediate companies as my clients, perhaps mentioning something like "worked with agency on solution X for breakfast cereal manufacturer Y"? This approach seems safer, but also seems significantly weaker from a marketing point of view.
However, strictly speaking, although I've worked on solutions for furniture manufacturer X, breakfast cereal manufacturer Y and telecoms operator Z, none of these have been my direct clients. They've all been through either recruitment agencies or other intermediates who outsource the technical effort (e.g. new media companies).
So - how would I give readers of my website the impression that I'm responsible for the technical work on these solutions without upsetting the intermediate companies - not to mention the end clients who may be upset to find out that their solution was predominantly produced by a one-man organisation?
Or should I let it go and just advertise the intermediate companies as my clients, perhaps mentioning something like "worked with agency on solution X for breakfast cereal manufacturer Y"? This approach seems safer, but also seems significantly weaker from a marketing point of view.

Comment