Good afternoon,
Apologies in advance if this has been discussed or answered previously, but I've searched extensively across a range of sources and I can't get a concrete answer to my question.
I'm currently a salaried employee on a one year fixed term contract being paid directly through the payroll of the company I'm carrying out work for.
We're currently in discussion over a contract extension to continue in my existing role, but the pay I'm asking for is outside the acceptable range as defined by the salary bands for staff employed directly through the company payroll. As a workaround, we're exploring the option of me switching to being paid a day rate via a third party agent. There are many other company workers that are paid in this way, but the company mandates that the worker be paid via their preferred agent, Hays.
I have a day rate in mind that I'm planning on asking for - specifically I mean the gross pay per day that I want to receive, irrespective of who ultimately pays my wages.
Firstly, how would this normally work in practice? If I say to my current employer that I want £300 per day, then what would Hays typically charge the client on top of that (given that, other than providing the payroll service, Hays have had no involvement in my recruitment). Would Hays then typically charge me as well for performing the payroll service (which would leave me with an effective gross pay per day of less than £300)? Or would that just be built in to what they invoice to the company I'm performing work for?
I'm just trying to avoid any surprises, and it can be difficult to discuss this as candidly as I would like with my employer without "showing them my hand" in negotiations.
Finally, would Hays' role in this arrangement be what you would strictly refer to as that of an "umbrella company"? Or would that be something slightly different. I guess I'm confused about the line between what is an "agent" and what is an "umbrella company", or is it just that sometimes an agent (by which I mean an entity that is reponsible for seeking and securing the contracting opportunity) often also acts as the umbrella company (the company responsible for issuing invoices to the client, and who pay the contractor via PAYE)?
If that is the case, would I be correct in thinking the above arrangement is almost like Hays being a mandated umbrella company?
I would really appreciate anyone's thoughts on the above.
Many thanks.
Apologies in advance if this has been discussed or answered previously, but I've searched extensively across a range of sources and I can't get a concrete answer to my question.
I'm currently a salaried employee on a one year fixed term contract being paid directly through the payroll of the company I'm carrying out work for.
We're currently in discussion over a contract extension to continue in my existing role, but the pay I'm asking for is outside the acceptable range as defined by the salary bands for staff employed directly through the company payroll. As a workaround, we're exploring the option of me switching to being paid a day rate via a third party agent. There are many other company workers that are paid in this way, but the company mandates that the worker be paid via their preferred agent, Hays.
I have a day rate in mind that I'm planning on asking for - specifically I mean the gross pay per day that I want to receive, irrespective of who ultimately pays my wages.
Firstly, how would this normally work in practice? If I say to my current employer that I want £300 per day, then what would Hays typically charge the client on top of that (given that, other than providing the payroll service, Hays have had no involvement in my recruitment). Would Hays then typically charge me as well for performing the payroll service (which would leave me with an effective gross pay per day of less than £300)? Or would that just be built in to what they invoice to the company I'm performing work for?
I'm just trying to avoid any surprises, and it can be difficult to discuss this as candidly as I would like with my employer without "showing them my hand" in negotiations.
Finally, would Hays' role in this arrangement be what you would strictly refer to as that of an "umbrella company"? Or would that be something slightly different. I guess I'm confused about the line between what is an "agent" and what is an "umbrella company", or is it just that sometimes an agent (by which I mean an entity that is reponsible for seeking and securing the contracting opportunity) often also acts as the umbrella company (the company responsible for issuing invoices to the client, and who pay the contractor via PAYE)?
If that is the case, would I be correct in thinking the above arrangement is almost like Hays being a mandated umbrella company?
I would really appreciate anyone's thoughts on the above.
Many thanks.


Comment