• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Need to hire/subcontract - help please

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Yes I quickly realised it was a crap idea.
    His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

    Comment


      #12
      Option 1 can give all types of problems and should be avoided at all costs, anyone doing this must be mad!

      Option 2 - easy to understand but gives you potential employment law problems, best avoided.

      Option 3 - easy and less risk, we have a few clients who do this quite successfully. Ensure that you see their VAT registration certificate etc.

      Alan

      Comment


        #13
        I favour option 2 but that's because I'm an empire building nutter. Option 3 is the cleanest.

        Yes, giving the subcontractor/employee a completion-based bonus is the least risky way to do it, but the road to big bucks is to charge the customers fixed price, pay the suppliers time and materials, manage to bring your projects in double-quick and pocket the difference.

        Comment

        Working...
        X