• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Need to hire/subcontract - help please"

Collapse

  • thunderlizard
    replied
    I favour option 2 but that's because I'm an empire building nutter. Option 3 is the cleanest.

    Yes, giving the subcontractor/employee a completion-based bonus is the least risky way to do it, but the road to big bucks is to charge the customers fixed price, pay the suppliers time and materials, manage to bring your projects in double-quick and pocket the difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nixon Williams
    replied
    Option 1 can give all types of problems and should be avoided at all costs, anyone doing this must be mad!

    Option 2 - easy to understand but gives you potential employment law problems, best avoided.

    Option 3 - easy and less risk, we have a few clients who do this quite successfully. Ensure that you see their VAT registration certificate etc.

    Alan

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Yes I quickly realised it was a crap idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac
    Obviously they have less shares than you do. The tricky bit is working out the distribution so you can calculate the dividend easily. Thinking about it it's probably a crap idea because if the business really takes off you'd be stuck paying someone 10% of the profits for life!
    Put the boot on the other foot.

    If someone came on here saying: "I've been offered this deal by somebody that I don't know, where I'm to be made a shareholder of the company, paid a small salary and promised a dividend out of profits at the end", would you be telling him to take it?

    The usual answer is, no way. It's all too easy for the principle to engineer massive expenses so that there is no profit. For each person out there who has got a good deal out of this method of working, there are 100 who've been ripped off.

    Superficially this deal might look good. But, for the potential employee, it just doesn't sit on the right place on the risk/reward curve.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    I think I'll get them to go Ltd.

    Need to figure out the wording for a schedule that states that 'x' per day is to be invoiced monthly and 'y' based on milestones being delivered.

    Thanks all anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Obviously they have less shares than you do. The tricky bit is working out the distribution so you can calculate the dividend easily. Thinking about it it's probably a crap idea because if the business really takes off you'd be stuck paying someone 10% of the profits for life!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac
    Yes I meant to say make them a shareholder as well. It may not be practical in this case but it's only a suggestion. You would pay employers NI on a bonus, but not on divis.

    But by making them a shareholder they would be entitled to a % of all divs paid even if the revenue was not based on their work? Or can you pay divs to some shareholders and not others (different classes of shares?)

    Thanks all for the replies though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Yes I meant to say make them a shareholder as well. It may not be practical in this case but it's only a suggestion. You would pay employers NI on a bonus, but not on divis.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac
    Option 4: Take him/her on as an employee, pay salary + divis?

    If you need any help recruiting, PM me. I have agency level access to Jobswerve & CW Jobs.
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but divis can only be paid to shareholders.
    Do you mean "pay completion bonus at end of gig"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife
    Hi Folks, Not sure if this should be in business or accounting but figured anywhere except general for a sensible reply (please).

    I am in the fortunate position of having more work than I can handle and so need to aquire another resource (both of us working on multiple projects at the same time). The contracts mean that MyCo wont get paid immediately as it's deliverable based invoicing but the person I have in mind will need to be paid monthly.

    The idea is to pay them a resonable monthly amount (few grand) and then a 'milestone bonus' when I get paid.

    Option 1: Ask them to go self employed (NI/PAYE is then not my prob?)
    Option 2: Employ them and take a % to cover holiday pay but with no minimum hours so if they're not working I don't have the added overhead but do have to pay additional NI.
    Option 3: Ask them to go Ltd and invoice for services provided (+VAT).

    Currently FRVS but will go way over threshold if this takes off.

    What would the panel suggest? What am I missing that could bite me in the ass later? (apart from the risk that the client doesn't pay me and I will still owe)

    At least IR35 isn't a worry.

    Thanks in advance.
    Option 4: Take him/her on as an employee, pay salary + divis?

    If you need any help recruiting, PM me. I have agency level access to Jobswerve & CW Jobs.

    Leave a comment:


  • premiere
    replied
    Agreed, Option 1 isn't that easy.

    Got a friend who owns a small security company. All his staff were employed on a 'self employed' basis and responsible for their own tax/ni, but because they were working for him regularly (set hours etc) , it was deemed by HMRC that they were in fact not self employed and he got stung for a load of Emp NI and stuff.

    I'd go for Option 3. Must easier...

    Leave a comment:


  • Emperor Dalek
    replied
    Option 3 is the way to go. Option 1 isn't as clear cut as you imply and there certainly have been cases where the deemed employer of a self-employed bod has ended up with the tax bill when the sub-contractor hasn't paid their taxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    started a topic Need to hire/subcontract - help please

    Need to hire/subcontract - help please

    Hi Folks, Not sure if this should be in business or accounting but figured anywhere except general for a sensible reply (please).

    I am in the fortunate position of having more work than I can handle and so need to aquire another resource (both of us working on multiple projects at the same time). The contracts mean that MyCo wont get paid immediately as it's deliverable based invoicing but the person I have in mind will need to be paid monthly.

    The idea is to pay them a resonable monthly amount (few grand) and then a 'milestone bonus' when I get paid.

    Option 1: Ask them to go self employed (NI/PAYE is then not my prob?)
    Option 2: Employ them and take a % to cover holiday pay but with no minimum hours so if they're not working I don't have the added overhead but do have to pay additional NI.
    Option 3: Ask them to go Ltd and invoice for services provided (+VAT).

    Currently FRVS but will go way over threshold if this takes off.

    What would the panel suggest? What am I missing that could bite me in the ass later? (apart from the risk that the client doesn't pay me and I will still owe)

    At least IR35 isn't a worry.

    Thanks in advance.
Working...
X