Originally posted by stek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Asked for commitment in very fluid situation
Collapse
X
-
-
Interesting thread...
I notice a lot of comments about the contract (and deciding whether or not to break it). Does it matter if your contract isn't with the client, but with an agency?
My first thought is that it might be worse, since you're (well, I would be) much more likely to get repeat business from an agent than from a client (it depends, though). I suppose it's true that you potentially upset two entities, rather than just one.
I can't see any arguments that would mean it is better if your contract is with an agent. Are there any?
I also wonder about the substitution argument - how easy is it to actually do that? If you are operating as a limited company, is it not possible to hire someone else, probably another contractor, to do the work for you? Is that sub-contracting?Comment
-
Originally posted by Bee View PostWhat is this!!! Trolling in the pro forums?
I'm sure you are already reporting everyone but if you don't like it report it and a mod will do the needful.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by dwater View PostInteresting thread...
I notice a lot of comments about the contract (and deciding whether or not to break it). Does it matter if your contract isn't with the client, but with an agency?
My first thought is that it might be worse, since you're (well, I would be) much more likely to get repeat business from an agent than from a client (it depends, though). I suppose it's true that you potentially upset two entities, rather than just one.
I can't see any arguments that would mean it is better if your contract is with an agent. Are there any?
I also wonder about the substitution argument - how easy is it to actually do that? If you are operating as a limited company, is it not possible to hire someone else, probably another contractor, to do the work for you? Is that sub-contracting?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment