• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Eastern European consultants not good enough for the UK

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The Equality Act plus Health and Safety legislation do apply to us. However like with employees good luck in trying to prove your case against a larger business.....
    Exactly.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by logozz View Post
      ...ah..you mean subtle nuances and such…(like for example confusing “ironic” with “paradoxical”?)

      ;-)
      Ermmmm. .....no. The situation was definitely ironic!

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by GB9 View Post
        Ermmmm. .....no. The situation was definitely ironic!


        There is nothing “ironic” about the situation you describe.

        A closer example of “situational irony” would be:

        "To ascertain that the documentation would be in correct English, the Dutch company hired a higher paid, native Brit. Ironically, it turned out to be riddled with common mistakes that the British do when it comes to their own language”.

        Key here is that there needs to be an expectation of a certain outcome, that then (unexpectedly) turns out to something quite different – presenting the opportunity for sarcasm...

        Or are you suggesting that it is generally surprising that a non-British person's English is worse? I don't think the client expected that the (English) language produced would be great because the person was not a native Brit (or because he was cheap)? I don't think the fact that they "paid peanuts and got monkeys" changes whether it is ironic or not...

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by logozz View Post
          There is nothing “ironic” about the situation you describe.

          A closer example of “situational irony” would be:

          "To ascertain that the documentation would be in correct English, the Dutch company hired a higher paid, native Brit. Ironically, it turned out to be riddled with common mistakes that the British do when it comes to their own language”.

          Key here is that there needs to be an expectation of a certain outcome, that then (unexpectedly) turns out to something quite different – presenting the opportunity for sarcasm...

          Or are you suggesting that it is generally surprising that a non-British person's English is worse? I don't think the client expected that the (English) language produced would be great because the person was not a native Brit (or because he was cheap)? I don't think the fact that they "paid peanuts and got monkeys" changes whether it is ironic or not...

          +1
          ...oh well what hope is there for them(EE nationals) when even some native English speakers can't write down their sentences correctly ( I have come across quite a number) thereby confusing the non-native speakers.. all comes down to bias in my opinion - most definitely illegal from my perspective and that of the law! They prob should have made an effort to come up with a non-biased reason for not having him.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by TNA57 View Post
            +1
            ...oh well what hope is there for them(EE nationals) when even some native English speakers can't write down their sentences correctly ( I have come across quite a number) thereby confusing the non-native speakers.. all comes down to bias in my opinion - most definitely illegal from my perspective and that of the law! They prob should have made an effort to come up with a non-biased reason for not having him.

            And............................................... .......Employment laws all over the world are broken every day of the week
            The Chunt of Chunts.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by TNA57 View Post
              all comes down to bias in my opinion - most definitely illegal from my perspective and that of the law! They prob should have made an effort to come up with a non-biased reason for not having him.
              No where in the entire scenario was it ever explained why the client didn't want the Polish guy.

              Posters like myself came up with reasons and examples why European nationals including Brits are discriminated against.

              Clients and employers, unless they are extremely stupid, never say why they have an issue to ensure you cannot take them to court.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                You are quite right. this what I am thinking. I think it is the hiring department being too lazy
                The clients London based? "Multicultural" & "Diverse" team?

                In my experience quite a few Eastern Europeans have ermm forthright and some would say old fashioned views on religion / sexual orientation. Possibly the client had a bad previous experience .

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Flashman View Post
                  The clients London based? "Multicultural" & "Diverse" team?

                  In my experience quite a few Eastern Europeans have ermm forthright and some would say old fashioned views on religion / sexual orientation. Possibly the client had a bad previous experience .

                  Agreed, my gay friend had an absolutely frightful time dealing coke with a "team" of Slovaks .

                  Oh.............................shiz, wrong forum
                  The Chunt of Chunts.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
                    The clients London based? "Multicultural" & "Diverse" team?

                    In my experience quite a few Eastern Europeans have ermm forthright and some would say old fashioned views on religion / sexual orientation. Possibly the client had a bad previous experience .
                    I've found they are as bigoted as British people.
                    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                      It is about the interface with the client nothing to do with market sector, location or travel.

                      The client is making a sweeping claim that unless they have worked in the Uk with UK clients they would not be suitable no matter what module of ERP.
                      UK business culture is quite different from that in, say, France, Germany and the Netherlands, and even more different from that in most of Eastern Europe. I can understand that they don't want to risk a relationship with a client by sending somebody who is not used to UK business culture to work alone for a client.

                      If it is about working as part of a supplier team, then it is different as there should be an engagement lead who takes care of most of the bumps.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X