• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Views on failed clauses

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by FiveTimes View Post
    I walked away from the last failed review from Qdos and unless they change the terms I'll do the same.

    I could work inside but as it involves a lot of travel and expense.
    In this instance it would probably be best to walk away rather than work outside. From your original post it looks like the contract is well inside anyway.

    As some food for thought for the future I would consider using alternative providers to QDOS to review your contracts. I used one of the other well known and reputable providers and was gobsmacked when they passed a review which QDOS had failed - if it's a contract you really want and consider the contract to have failures in grey areas then this may be worthwhile. If one passes and one fails you then have a dilemma...

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post
      In this instance it would probably be best to walk away rather than work outside. From your original post it looks like the contract is well inside anyway.

      As some food for thought for the future I would consider using alternative providers to QDOS to review your contracts. I used one of the other well known and reputable providers and was gobsmacked when they passed a review which QDOS had failed - if it's a contract you really want and consider the contract to have failures in grey areas then this may be worthwhile. If one passes and one fails you then have a dilemma...
      That sounds like keep trying until you get the result you want rather than deciding based upon the result you are given.

      As many have said, nighjng wrong with a bit of inside ir35 when necessary, however, under the new T&S rules this would be stone dead for me.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by GB9 View Post
        That sounds like keep trying until you get the result you want rather than deciding based upon the result you are given.

        As many have said, nighjng wrong with a bit of inside ir35 when necessary, however, under the new T&S rules this would be stone dead for me.
        In some ways yes. I took that approach as I sent it to my accountants (yes I know.. they aren't necessarily professional reviewers but do offer the service) and was surprised when they said in their opinion it was ok, hence sending it to the other company (of equal stature to QDOS) to review.

        The point for me was that I had 2 groups saying pass (accountants and review company) and QDOS saying fail. I accept that it is open to interpretation but I have found that QDOS have been more likely to fail contracts over the last 2 years than at any time I used them in the previous 5 or 6.

        For that particular contract I was comfortable that on balance of probabilities it was more likely to be a pass than a fail. It's a shame that even the professionals find it hard to agree.
        Last edited by ShandyDrinker; 17 May 2016, 18:25.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post

          For that particular contract I was comfortable that on balance of probabilities it was more likely to be a pass than a fail. It's a shame that even the professionals find it hard to agree.
          IR35 is a grey law so the more people you ask the more opinions you will get.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post
            In some ways yes. I took that approach as I sent it to my accountants (yes I know.. they aren't necessarily professional reviewers but do offer the service) and was surprised when they said in their opinion it was ok, hence sending it to the other company (of equal stature to QDOS) to review.

            The point for me was that I had 2 groups saying pass (accountants and review company) and QDOS saying fail. I accept that it is open to interpretation but I have found that QDOS have been more likely to fail contracts over the last 2 years than at any time I used them in the previous 5 or 6.

            For that particular contract I was comfortable that on balance of probabilities it was more likely to be a pass than a fail. It's a shame that even the professionals find it hard to agree.
            Hence why I not only get my contracts reviewed but I ask the reviewer to put their money where their mouth is and back it up with insurance.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
              IR35 is a grey law so the more people you ask the more opinions you will get.
              Very true. But if you seek more opinions and then the consensus becomes it's a fail for IR35 you know you should definitely walk away.

              I think many people would seek a second or third opinion from the medical profession for a serious diagnosis; I view this as being no different.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post
                Very true. But if you seek more opinions and then the consensus becomes it's a fail for IR35 you know you should definitely walk away.

                I think many people would seek a second or third opinion from the medical profession for a serious diagnosis; I view this as being no different.
                Full marks for diligence.

                I have certainly found qdos to be strict, however, that gives me reassurance that a pass genuinely is a pass.

                Comment

                Working...
                X