Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Views on failed clauses
Collapse
X
-
-
Indeed but I was assuming there is enough work out there that anyone worth their salt didn't need to take an Inside IR35 gig.Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostNo, he can still take it and work under IR35.
There are of course the droves that don't do any diligence and would take it ignorant of it's IR35 status and just continue as normal. Good luck to them, I wouldn't have thought any decent contractor would have been part of that army. But if you are aware of it and do the diligence that fails then surely you'd drop it and get a proper gig.
Each to their own I guess.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Also the point that struck me when I read the first post was, if that is the contract is that bad what the hell are the working practices like. Yes it's possible there is no link at all but it gets my alarm bells going.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I walked away from the last failed review from Qdos and unless they change the terms I'll do the same.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIndeed but was taking the context given by the OP that it's a BIG FAT fail, the consultancy won't change it yet the OP is only 'considering'not taking it. Yes he should get QDOS to negotiate but if they consultancy won't change his got to leave it surely?
I could work inside but as it involves a lot of travel and expense.Comment
-
Maybe have some fun and quote them an inside IR35 rate?Originally posted by FiveTimes View PostI walked away from the last failed review from Qdos and unless they change the terms I'll do the same.
I could work inside but as it involves a lot of travel and expense.Comment
-
It is better than the bench...
If I needed the money I would take it, operate as IR35 caught and push money towards my pension.
I am surprised someone with so many posts would bother to have such a poor contract reviewed. It was always going to fail.Last edited by dx4100; 17 May 2016, 17:20.Comment
-
Sorry pal, but that's the only logical thing that you've posted all thread.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAlso the point that struck me when I read the first post was, if that is the contract is that bad what the hell are the working practices like. Yes it's possible there is no link at all but it gets my alarm bells going.
Ideally you want an outside of IR35 contract.
If it is, then great, in you go.
If it isn't, then there are decisions to make in terms of the long/short term pay off of taking the gig. Going full-on PAYE for 6 months isn't the end of the world if the day rate is fantastic and being outside is simply a bonus. To turn something down blindly because it's inside IR35 is misleading.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Ah walk away from it then.Originally posted by FiveTimes View PostI could work inside but as it involves a lot of travel and expense.
Comment
-
Not so sure I said blindly. I did mention later my assumptions in an earlier post so it's down to choice. My personal choice is to walk away from it as so far I have been able to get a gig in time to make it worth it taking the gamble. Another assumption I made is most would do the same. Didn't realise I had to explain so many assumptions to try make a decent point but there you go.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostSorry pal, but that's the only logical thing that you've posted all thread.
Ideally you want an outside of IR35 contract.
If it is, then great, in you go.
If it isn't, then there are decisions to make in terms of the long/short term pay off of taking the gig. Going full-on PAYE for 6 months isn't the end of the world if the day rate is fantastic and being outside is simply a bonus. To turn something down blindly because it's inside IR35 is misleading.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Clearly you did you grumpy old sodOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostNot so sure I said blindly. I did mention later my assumptions in an earlier post so it's down to choice. My personal choice is to walk away from it as so far I have been able to get a gig in time to make it worth it taking the gamble. Another assumption I made is most would do the same. Didn't realise I had to explain so many assumptions to try make a decent point but there you go.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment