• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You can use our licence....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Milkyway View Post
    Indeed, but would it not fail IR35 compliance points... I.e. By using client's resources, machine or software, et al.?
    This seems to be one of the standard point or question in IR35 checklist though that contributes to determine the working practices fail, etc.
    Vas ist diz IR35 compliances of vhich you speak?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Milkyway View Post
      Indeed, but would it not fail IR35 compliance points... I.e. By using client's resources, machine or software, et al.?
      This seems to be one of the standard point or question in IR35 checklist though that contributes to determine the working practices fail, etc.
      I think that varies by industry. As a tradesman, I'd expect to use my own tools. In IT, it's very much down to the security policies of the client. I know I wouldn't want unvetted equipment on my network (oo-er!).
      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by jmo21 View Post
        Not really if everyone else is the same.

        Most places I've worked simply won't let you bring a laptop on site.
        Originally posted by Milkyway View Post
        Indeed, but would it not fail IR35 compliance points... I.e. By using client's resources, machine or software, et al.?
        No.

        If it is the same for everyone (contractors, permies, £2000/day management consultants) it won't be an issue.

        There are lots of little things you should keep an eye on with regards to IR35, but I do not believe this is one of them.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by OnceStonedRose View Post
          Yes, but the "IR35" situation is a bunch of tests/checks, which all add up to a decision.

          Surely mitigating as many is what keeps us out of harms way no?
          All comes down to risk appetite. As do most business decisions.


          most Risk averse - swallow £4k licence
          Risk averse - run and get another gig


          more risk appetite - use their kit

          it's only one indicator

          Comment


            #15
            Just download it from piratebay for the time being. Do the gig and uninstall?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by OnceStonedRose View Post
              Am on site at client offices, have been 7 weeks, and they have tests that use the MS fakes library stuff which ships with Visual Studio enterprise edition.

              I, as working for my Ltd. Co, have MSDN professional. This means that I can't build and run the clients test projects, which they want.

              They understand the situation and have offered to install the enterpsie edition on a dev machine of theirs and let me use that.

              Wondering what you'd do, as i can see it i have choices of:
              • Buy enterprise package at £4k +
              • Use their dodgy, as already in use by their dev, this is not a "spare", licence
              • Inform the client and agency that gonna have to let them down as don't have tools to execute the work.
              Can you create a virtual machine on your laptop and then uninstall the dodgy as soon as you're done?
              The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by OnceStonedRose View Post
                Surely mitigating as many is what keeps us out of harms way no?
                In general, I'd agree.

                I don't think this is a case of mitigating a problem, though. It isn't a problem to use client equipment. It's neutral.

                It's the difference between a negative, a positive, and a neutral.

                It's a plus on your side if you pay for and use your own equipment, because employees don't generally do that. But non-employees frequently use engagers' equipment, especially if it is specialist equipment, or if there are security factors or license issues. So in this case you'd say, "Usually I use my own equipment, but there was a license issue on this contract so I couldn't."

                Comment

                Working...
                X