Originally posted by MrMarkyMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Leaving mid-contract - thoughts
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post+1 I'm on 100 notes a day less at my new local gig but if I factor in the travel costs for when i was in London it works out at 10-20 quid a day in reality, less hassle travelling and I get to leave later and be home earlier, it's a no brainer.
Some things are worth a lot more than cold cash.
Some rates in London are just bleeding poor .The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by SlipTheJab View Post+1 I'm on 100 notes a day less at my new local gig but if I factor in the travel costs for when i was in London it works out at 10-20 quid a day in reality, less hassle travelling and I get to leave later and be home earlier, it's a no brainer.
If I'm comparing a £350/day in Manchester v staying away for £450/day then I'd go with the non-staying over gig, all other things being equal (work, working practice, etc.)
If I'm comparing a £350/day in West Yorkshire/Merseyside v staying away for £550/day then even with T&S, staying away wins.
The biggie for me is PAYE status, not T&S. Full PAYE + T&S would see me potentially going down the permie consultant route as a better way of maintaining a project-based working lifestyle, with the training, holiday, bonus and other benefits thrown in.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostGood example.
Some things are worth a lot more than cold cash.
Some rates in London are just bleeding poor .Comment
-
Originally posted by moneymoney View Postnotice period is 2 weeks
the reason to bail is that the other role is much better for my career in the long run.........
the reason to stay is that i'm currently under contract and I don't feel it's right to leave mid-contract
You have the contractual "right" to serve them with 2 weeks notice, then leave. Ergo, you should not "feel it's not right" because it is. You have the contractual right. Forget morality, ethics etc. You're not there to "save" the client, you're not a charity. You're a separate legal entity, a separate business with a contract between your Ltd. and the client, a contract that allows you to do exactly what you want to do. This is a non-question. JFDI.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSo you think it is acceptable leave a client in the lurch everytime a better contract comes along. What kind of tulip would contracting be in if we all did that?Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostYou signed knowing the expectations of the client. They didn't hide anything from you. You never set the expectation you would bail at the next gig that came along.
I might go into a contract with expectations that I'll be extended again and again for evermore. I'm sure I'd be sorely disappointed when a renewal eventually does not come through. And I'm sure the client will be incredibly sympathetic that they've not met my expectations of what I thought the contract would be. </sarcasm>Comment
-
Originally posted by moneymoney View Postnotice period is 2 weeksOriginally posted by moneymoney View Postthey will be surprised/annoyed, but my real regret is that I didn't have this offer available when they took a week to renew my contract....if I had walked then they would have been left in the lurch and legally I would have been well within my rights to do so as they had dropped the ball by allowing my contract to expire without a new one in place. This has happened for nearly every contractor at the client co, which IMO is really poor business practice
So long as you serve them with the 2 weeks notice that your contract says you must, you're still legally well within your rights.Comment
-
Originally posted by Cirrus View Post...have a bit of a moral obligation....
...Business is business...Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostGonna be interesting once T&S rules kick in. I have a horrible feeling a lot of 'contractors' are going to be taking any gig to get of the bench and dumping them when a gig comes up closer to home so it's going to get a whole lot worse.
Might focus clients attention a bit to start nagging the government about this. At the moment, I think theres a bit of a feeling of - not my problem, poor you got to pay more tax from clients. Certainly is where I am!
Only when the whole situation starts to make contracting unviable will they realise it affects them as well.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Yesterday 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
Comment