Page 921 of the agreement

[darmstadt]

It comes from UK/EU cutting and pasting from existing EU legislation on sharing DNA data. The EU member states came up with it and will continue to abide by it.

I think Brexit is a mistake, but putting this on the UK is rabid Brexiter-esque nonsense, it shows both sides cheerleaders have a veneer of knowledge on these matters.

We know that but what it does show is that the agreement was too rushed and obviously not checked by the relevant experts. What other monumental cockups are there in it which will come back to haunt both sides, and remember, its a legally binding document?

[TheGreenBastard]

We know that but what it does show is that the agreement was too rushed and obviously not checked by the relevant experts. What other monumental cockups are there in it which will come back to haunt both sides, and remember, its a legally binding document?

I think alignment with previous EU law (which is what it appears to be on the face of it) is 100% the best option, both in terms of change and time constraints.

This isn't a monumental cockup, it's status quo.

Had we remained, this would have still been the requirements in terms of security for sharing DNA data.