• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Page 921 of the agreement"

Collapse

  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    We know that but what it does show is that the agreement was too rushed and obviously not checked by the relevant experts. What other monumental cockups are there in it which will come back to haunt both sides, and remember, its a legally binding document?
    I think alignment with previous EU law (which is what it appears to be on the face of it) is 100% the best option, both in terms of change and time constraints.

    This isn't a monumental cockup, it's status quo.

    Had we remained, this would have still been the requirements in terms of security for sharing DNA data.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View Post
    It comes from UK/EU cutting and pasting from existing EU legislation on sharing DNA data. The EU member states came up with it and will continue to abide by it.

    I think Brexit is a mistake, but putting this on the UK is rabid Brexiter-esque nonsense, it shows both sides cheerleaders have a veneer of knowledge on these matters.
    We know that but what it does show is that the agreement was too rushed and obviously not checked by the relevant experts. What other monumental cockups are there in it which will come back to haunt both sides, and remember, its a legally binding document?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Nope. Its the UK cutting/pasting any old rubbish. It just shows the contempt the UK has for technology.

    I am still waiting for the Bletchley Park cyber security school.
    It comes from UK/EU cutting and pasting from existing EU legislation on sharing DNA data. The EU member states came up with it and will continue to abide by it.

    I think Brexit is a mistake, but putting this on the UK is rabid Brexiter-esque nonsense, it shows both sides cheerleaders have a veneer of knowledge on these matters.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View Post
    Isn't this EU legislation? UK/EU choosing to inherit it due to it being status quo / low friction.
    Nope. Its the UK cutting/pasting any old rubbish. It just shows the contempt the UK has for technology.

    I am still waiting for the Bletchley Park cyber security school.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    ...
    Isn't this EU legislation? UK/EU choosing to inherit it due to it being status quo / low friction.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Liz Truss;Secretary of State for International Trade
    “I really do feel that we are world-leading in technology.”
    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    In theory no payments due to EU so £ 350 mln saving per week, a YUGE result that one would have thought Boris would claim
    it was a misprint. it was £350/week saving.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by fullyautomatix View Post
    When will we start seeing the benefits of Brexit ? Would it be on Jan 1st ?
    In theory no payments due to EU so £ 350 mln saving per week, a YUGE result that one would have thought Boris would claim

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    When will we start seeing the benefits of Brexit ? Would it be on Jan 1st ? Will they announce reduction of income tax straight away ? What other benefits will I get ? We are free of EU now and can set our own agenda and the first and foremost should be to make every citizen wealthy. Maybe do a USA and dispatch a cheque to everybody ?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    £ 350 mln due on Mondays?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Yes, funny. Presumably copy/pasted from something rather older.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    started a topic Page 921 of the agreement

    Page 921 of the agreement

    Ha ha...

Working...
X