Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More than 500,000 people sign petition to scrap Brexit and remain in EU
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostTHIS ^^^^^^
and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostTHIS ^^^^^^
and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostI’m not sure what you guys are smoking this morning, but it looks like you’re mixing metaphors, so to speak:
- Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
- any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
- “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.
Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.
and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.Leave a comment:
-
See below. Stop obsessing over this two stage withdrawal agreement then future relationship business.
I’m not sure what you guys are smoking this morning, but it looks like you’re mixing metaphors, so to speak:
- Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
Nobody said it does from a legal respective but from a political and democratic perspective it would be madness.
- any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
the withdrawal agreement is too messy and solves almost nothing. Time to stop kicking the can down the road and agree the future relationship. Should be easy enough if an off the shelf model.
- “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.
the sovereignty of parliament is such that it can pass an act with some terms to be decided by a referendum.
Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.[/QUOTE]
we are clearly talking about the future. Agree to hold European elections. Then decide to hold a referendum for the future relationship. Then agree two options that the EU will accept, and put the on ballot paper. Or agree one option the EU will accept and put that on ballot paper alongside no deal.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostExactly. I only signed it to troll the gammons. It is a silly idea, although the fact that May dismisses it is of limited relevance.
If A50 is to be withdrawn, It can only be after another referendum. But a second referendum with remain on the ballot paper would be ill advised. It should be about how the UK leaves. An EFTA type model should be one option. The other a Canada type model. This should have been set out a long time ago but here we are.Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostI would agree, but the No Deal option, which still remains as a legitimate default, should also be on the ballot paper. Let the people decide.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostDon't get religious about the No Deal. Pretty much every no deal supporter would rather have Canada plus, but it has not been negotiated, so the ERG has fallen back on on deal. The problem with Canada is that the EU may not entertain it as it would breach the GFA. In that case, the options are EFTA type model or No Deal.
- Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
- any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
- “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.
Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostSo what.
The petition requires 100,000 signatures for it to be discussed in parliament.
May has discussed it and said no.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View Post2,783,605 signatures and counting. Gammons starting to feel the heat. Bloodpressure is rising and faces starting to colour purple which brings them in to post gammon state.
The petition requires 100,000 signatures for it to be discussed in parliament.
May has discussed it and said no.
People who continue to vote now are simply wasting electrons.
But I imagine they are to fooking triggered to notice that.
[emoji849]Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostNo, there were 33,577,342 votes placed in a period of less than 24 hours of which 33,551,983 were deemed valid with 17,410,742 votes to leave the EU and 16,141,241 to remain in the EU.
Let's remember that people had to put some real effort into actually voting in the referendum, not just click on a few icons and enter a few details into a computer.Leave a comment:
-
2,783,605 signatures and counting. Gammons starting to feel the heat. Bloodpressure is rising and faces starting to colour purple which brings them in to post gammon state.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: