• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

More than 500,000 people sign petition to scrap Brexit and remain in EU

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
    I'm not sure I agree with that. There were 17M voted for it so not sure why 3M should a difference now.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSharp
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    THIS ^^^^^^

    and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
    I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.
    It's more then that the ERG and Tories know they are toast at the next election, which is why they need May to resign so they can start implementing their version of a hard Brexit or take control of negotiating beyond the back stop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    THIS ^^^^^^

    and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
    I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.
    I like to see a triggered gammon as much as the next smug metropolitan elitist, but to withdraw A50 without even a referendum would be a serious outrage against democracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    I’m not sure what you guys are smoking this morning, but it looks like you’re mixing metaphors, so to speak:

    - Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
    - any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
    - “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.

    Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.
    THIS ^^^^^^

    and with 3M, and growing, saying revoke A.50, they're going to have to pay attention.
    I'll say it again, this is not abouit Brexit anymore. It's about the party.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    See below. Stop obsessing over this two stage withdrawal agreement then future relationship business.



    I’m not sure what you guys are smoking this morning, but it looks like you’re mixing metaphors, so to speak:

    - Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
    Nobody said it does from a legal respective but from a political and democratic perspective it would be madness.
    - any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
    the withdrawal agreement is too messy and solves almost nothing. Time to stop kicking the can down the road and agree the future relationship. Should be easy enough if an off the shelf model.
    - “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.

    the sovereignty of parliament is such that it can pass an act with some terms to be decided by a referendum.

    Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.[/QUOTE]

    we are clearly talking about the future. Agree to hold European elections. Then decide to hold a referendum for the future relationship. Then agree two options that the EU will accept, and put the on ballot paper. Or agree one option the EU will accept and put that on ballot paper alongside no deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Exactly. I only signed it to troll the gammons. It is a silly idea, although the fact that May dismisses it is of limited relevance.

    If A50 is to be withdrawn, It can only be after another referendum. But a second referendum with remain on the ballot paper would be ill advised. It should be about how the UK leaves. An EFTA type model should be one option. The other a Canada type model. This should have been set out a long time ago but here we are.
    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
    I would agree, but the No Deal option, which still remains as a legitimate default, should also be on the ballot paper. Let the people decide.
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Don't get religious about the No Deal. Pretty much every no deal supporter would rather have Canada plus, but it has not been negotiated, so the ERG has fallen back on on deal. The problem with Canada is that the EU may not entertain it as it would breach the GFA. In that case, the options are EFTA type model or No Deal.
    I’m not sure what you guys are smoking this morning, but it looks like you’re mixing metaphors, so to speak:

    - Revoking A50 does not require a referendum
    - any talk about whether we go for EFTA, Canada, etc is about the future relationship. Which option the U.K. goes for will need to be determined whether we go for May’s Deal or No Deal.
    - “let the people decide” implies a binding referendum, not an advisory one. Parliament is sovereign.

    Any referendum in the future might have EFTA or Canada or No Deal With The EU on it, but that’s for the future. The only question available now is Revoke, May’s Deal, or No Withdrawal Agreement. With an additional option now (thanks to the EU) of Extend for a longer period if the WA is not approved.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    So what.

    The petition requires 100,000 signatures for it to be discussed in parliament.

    May has discussed it and said no.
    May is not Parliament. She would like to be, it she is not.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    2,783,605 signatures and counting. Gammons starting to feel the heat. Bloodpressure is rising and faces starting to colour purple which brings them in to post gammon state.
    So what.

    The petition requires 100,000 signatures for it to be discussed in parliament.

    May has discussed it and said no.

    People who continue to vote now are simply wasting electrons.

    But I imagine they are to fooking triggered to notice that.

    [emoji849]

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    No, there were 33,577,342 votes placed in a period of less than 24 hours of which 33,551,983 were deemed valid with 17,410,742 votes to leave the EU and 16,141,241 to remain in the EU.

    Let's remember that people had to put some real effort into actually voting in the referendum, not just click on a few icons and enter a few details into a computer.
    Voting was open for nearly three weeks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    2,783,605 signatures and counting. Gammons starting to feel the heat. Bloodpressure is rising and faces starting to colour purple which brings them in to post gammon state.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X