Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So the current issue is that the UK politicians are not ratifying the deal May has agreed with the EU?
That is the main stumbling block now?
Sealioning again oPM?
You know the current issue is 100% the fault of your beloved leave MPs not ratifying the deal. More remain MPs have voted for us to leave with this deal than leave MPs
Maybe we should replace the ERG MPs with remain MPs and we could actually get to leave the EU after all on 29th March
You know the current issue is 100% the fault of your beloved leave MPs not ratifying the deal. More remain MPs have voted for us to leave with this deal than leave MPs
Maybe we should replace the ERG MPs with remain MPs and we could actually get to leave the EU after all on 29th March
Why should a crap deal be ratified? Everyone knew, including Junker that the deal would have to be approved by the UK Parliament, it hasn't been and as the EU have steadfastly refused to improve the deal after the first vote so that is why we're in the position we're in.
Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.
Why should a crap deal be ratified? Everyone knew, including Junker that the deal would have to be approved by the UK Parliament, it hasn't been and as the UK have steadfastly refused to outline exactly what changes would need to be made in order to pass Parliament that is why we're in the position we're in.
Why should a crap deal be ratified? Everyone knew, including Junker that the deal would have to be approved by the UK Parliament, it hasn't been and as the EU have steadfastly refused to improve the deal after the first vote so that is why we're in the position we're in.
The EU27 and the UK government negotiated and agreed this deal in (supposedly) good faith. The fact that the UK government did not work with parliament before it agreed this deal with the EU27 is not the fault of the EU.
It isn't the EU27's responsibility to get the deal through parliament. It is the UK governments job. Common sense would suggest you do this via collaboration before agreeing with the EU27
If you still don't understand this maybe head down to the local school, and see if you can get a grade 7 kid to draw it for you in crayons
The EU27 and the UK government negotiated and agreed this deal in (supposedly) good faith. The fact that the UK government did not work with parliament before it agreed this deal with the EU27 is not the fault of the EU.
It isn't the EU27's responsibility to get the deal through parliament. It is the UK governments job. Common sense would suggest you do this via collaboration before agreeing with the EU27
If you still don't understand this maybe head down to the local school, and see if you can get a grade 7 kid to draw it for you in crayons
I didn't say it was the responsibility for the EU to get the deal through the UK parliament. I said the EU had to wait for the deal to be ratified by the UK Parliament.
So, stop molesting that Grade 7 kid and let him draw you a picture.
Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.
Why should a crap deal be ratified? Everyone knew, including Junker that the deal would have to be approved by the UK Parliament, it hasn't been and as the EU have steadfastly refused to improve the deal after the first vote so that is why we're in the position we're in.
I didn't say it was the responsibility for the EU to get the deal through the UK parliament. I said the EU had to wait for the deal to be ratified by the UK Parliament.
You referred to it as a crap deal and implied it was the EUs fault it hadn't been ratified by parliament as they refused to improve the deal.
Why should the EU improve the deal? It was agreed in good faith. If it was so crap May should not have agreed it with the EU before putting it to parliament. The UK parliament can reject the deal as often as they like, it is not the responsibility of the EU to come up with improvements; it is up to the UK to suggest changes that they can get through Westminster that can be ratified by EU27.
Problem is, Westminster can't agree with themselves. All these problems are caused by the Leave campaign, promising unicorns but delivering pigsh1t. Even now they can't admit that they sold vapourware
Let's just crash out. Teach the leave sheeple a valuable lesson, then we can get the UK back on it's feet and back into the EU once the old xenophobes are gone.
Comment