Originally posted by original PM
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Que será, será
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostIs one of the changes you would like to see the near elimination of manufacturing in the British economy and for jobs to be mainly in industries such as design and marketing?
There is an argument that our car industry suffered demise for quality, reliability and production issues, but my contention is that if we had not been part of the EU, the likes of Ford etc. would have found it more difficult to switch manufacturing to the EU.
If we take the quality issue, then that can easily be countered by cost. Dacia cars are popular, not because of their quality or reliability aspects, but because they are cheap to buy. The same situation would have endured with our products if we had not joined the EU. In the 60's a Renault tin can (Floride/Caravelle) was the same price here as a MK2 Jaguar. Whatever quality or reliability issues you direct at the Jaguar, it was a far better car than the Renault, and also cheaper.
If you go to Germany, then you can't fail to notice that all Government department related cars are either Audis, BMWs or Mercedes. The same is true for Italy. Most are Fiats or Alfas. France is exactly the same. Most official cars are Renaults, Citroens or Peugeots.
Apart from Mrs' May's Jaguar, most cabinet Ministers cars appear to be BMWs. Do you think the Germans would use Jaguars? Hardly.
The same is true of our Police forces. The majority of vehicles are BMWs. None of this would have happened if we had not been members of the EU.Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postthe EU has already mainly achieved that when compared with the situation prior to us joining the EU. Ford don't make a private car here in the UK any longer. Most of our traditional marques have disappeared. In the 1960's, only 1 in 10 cars on our roads was made abroad, now it's difficult to spot a car made in this country.
There is an argument that our car industry suffered demise for quality, reliability and production issues, but my contention is that if we had not been part of the EU, the likes of Ford etc. would have found it more difficult to switch manufacturing to the EU.
If we take the quality issue, then that can easily be countered by cost. Dacia cars are popular, not because of their quality or reliability aspects, but because they are cheap to buy. The same situation would have endured with our products if we had not joined the EU. In the 60's a Renault tin can (Floride/Caravelle) was the same price here as a MK2 Jaguar. Whatever quality or reliability issues you direct at the Jaguar, it was a far better car than the Renault, and also cheaper.
If you go to Germany, then you can't fail to notice that all Government department related cars are either Audis, BMWs or Mercedes. The same is true for Italy. Most are Fiats or Alfas. France is exactly the same. Most official cars are Renaults, Citroens or Peugeots.
Apart from Mrs' May's Jaguar, most cabinet Ministers cars appear to be BMWs. Do you think the Germans would use Jaguars? Hardly.
The same is true of our Police forces. The majority of vehicles are BMWs. None of this would have happened if we had not been members of the EU.Comment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostYes, of course it's all the EU's fault that we make crap unreliable cars and we charge more for them, and that our government departments don't want to buy our expensive crap unreliable cars.
they would have been significantly less costly if we had not joined the UK, which as I've indicated with the Dacia example, would have over-ridden any quality/reliability issues.
Just to demonstrate.
In 1973 I toured the Continent by car. There I met up with an IT professional in Holland and we discussed salaries and the cost of living etc. I was working shifts as a supervisor of a large computer bureau, with 11 people reporting to me. He was a programmer workings days if I remember correctly. His salary was well over twice as much as mine, although his living expenses were much higher also. However, he was driving a Mercedes which would have been impossible for me to buy in this country. Yes, the Mercedes was probably a much better car that the BL offering I was driving, but it was also more than double the cost. So price will always defeat the quality/reliability argument. This is why we buy so much these days from third World countries.Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post"we charge more for them"
they would have been significantly less costly if we had not joined the UK, which as I've indicated with the Dacia example, would have over-ridden any quality/reliability issues.
Just to demonstrate.
In 1973 I toured the Continent by car. There I met up with an IT professional in Holland and we discussed salaries and the cost of living etc. I was working shifts as a supervisor of a large computer bureau, with 11 people reporting to me. He was a programmer workings days if I remember correctly. His salary was well over twice as much as mine, although his living expenses were much higher also. However, he was driving a Mercedes which would have been impossible for me to buy in this country. Yes, the Mercedes was probably a much better car that the BL offering I was driving, but it was also more than double the cost. So price will always defeat the quality/reliability argument. This is why we buy so much these days from third World countries.
HTH.Comment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostYou've demonstrated nothing but unrelated waffle.
HTH.
It is said that the "oldies" swung the referendum vote, and I'm demonstrating one aspect of why some might have been influenced.Comment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostYou've demonstrated nothing but unrelated waffle.
HTH.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Today 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Yesterday 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
- Business Account with ANNA Money Nov 1 15:51
Comment