For a short while David Davis was my hero because he was saying Canada++ is the only viable route forward. It seemed like something you could start working on, instead of all the pie-in-the-sky-and-eat-it nonsense being pedalled by the Government.
The problem however with this short term love affair was Canada++ isn't viable. It leaves a border in Ireland and it doesn't cover 80% of our trade.
However as we stare Armageddon in the face, you have to reassess the situation. Canada++ doesn't tick many boxes but it ticks more than WTO Crash-out. With No-Deal you get borders and you get tariffs, quotas, inspections, rule-taking (in effect), no passporting - well all the downsides.
Now surely, when the UK finally has to accept that there is no Cake-and-Eat-It - and they have to choose between Remain or Leave - then Canada++ is always going to be better than No-Deal.
So why do people keep on talking about No-Deal being the most likely outcome? It's impossible, surely?
The problem however with this short term love affair was Canada++ isn't viable. It leaves a border in Ireland and it doesn't cover 80% of our trade.
However as we stare Armageddon in the face, you have to reassess the situation. Canada++ doesn't tick many boxes but it ticks more than WTO Crash-out. With No-Deal you get borders and you get tariffs, quotas, inspections, rule-taking (in effect), no passporting - well all the downsides.
Now surely, when the UK finally has to accept that there is no Cake-and-Eat-It - and they have to choose between Remain or Leave - then Canada++ is always going to be better than No-Deal.
So why do people keep on talking about No-Deal being the most likely outcome? It's impossible, surely?
Comment