Wow just wow

[Eirikur]

His divorce bill from his German ex-wife must be racking up

[original PM]

Except he didn't work for them.
1. He rarely ever turned up at meetings (or voted)
2. He was never working for the EU, always against anything Europe wanted.

Regardless - if his 'employer' at the time had a problem with it then it should have been dealt with at the time.

It's just important to note that someones rights cannot be removed just because people do not like them.

[WTFH]

It's just important to note that someones rights cannot be removed just because people do not like them.

Haha. Comedy from you today?

What "rights" are these?
Who will he take them up with? ECJ, ECHR? Oh yeah, he hates the ECJ and EHCR, doesn't want anything to do with them.
He campaigned that foreigners should not have rights. He should be forced to live with the consequences of what he preaches, otherwise he is a bigger hypocrite than the people he hates.

[BrilloPad]

Except he didn't work for them.
1. He rarely ever turned up at meetings (or voted)
2. He was never working for the EU, always against anything Europe wanted.

1. Agreed.
2. He was working for the UK. He will be viewed historically as important as Maggie. And just as divisive.

[BrilloPad]

His divorce bill from his German ex-wife must be racking up

My father had a German ex-wife. She fell off the back of his motorbike and died. He then spent weeks on a cargo ship off the East coast of Africa.

I bet it was a damned good party.....

[BrilloPad]

Haha. Comedy from you today?

What "rights" are these?
Who will he take them up with? ECJ, ECHR? Oh yeah, he hates the ECJ and EHCR, doesn't want anything to do with them.
He campaigned that foreigners should not have rights. He should be forced to live with the consequences of what he preaches, otherwise he is a bigger hypocrite than the people he hates.

What about responsibilities?

[WTFH]

What about responsibilities?

His responsibilities were to his constituents, to represent them and engage in debate and voting in an effort to achieve the best outcome for them. He failed to debate, he failed to vote.

[chopper]

His responsibilities were to his constituents, to represent them and engage in debate and voting in an effort to achieve the best outcome for them. He failed to debate, he failed to vote.

And yet he has been an MEP for 18 years. They keep voting for him/his party (the name of which escapes me, I believe they've disappeared into an abyss)

[original PM]

Haha. Comedy from you today?

What "rights" are these?
Who will he take them up with? ECJ, ECHR? Oh yeah, he hates the ECJ and EHCR, doesn't want anything to do with them.
He campaigned that foreigners should not have rights. He should be forced to live with the consequences of what he preaches, otherwise he is a bigger hypocrite than the people he hates.

Look I would not give the man the steam of my pish.

But he is entitled to the pension for the years he was in the employee of the EU or whatever.

[Bean]

His responsibilities were to his constituents, to represent them and engage in debate and voting in an effort to achieve the best outcome for them. He failed to debate, he failed to vote.

Is that what his employment contract stated?