The purpose of the journey is to visit family and not for business and therefore I can't see that any of the costs would be allowable tbh
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cost relating to working while travelling?
Collapse
X
-
-
Yes but we're not talking about the journey, we're talking about additional costs once I'm already making the trip...Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostThe purpose of the journey is to visit family and not for business and therefore I can't see that any of the costs would be allowable tbh
If my sole purpose for the upgrade is to give me an acceptable working environment, then isn't that by definition a business purpose?Originally posted by pacontracting View PostThis means that your sole purpose for the expenditure must be a business purpose.
If I were flying on holiday and an airport offered "hire by the hour office space" with hot-desks including free internet, comfortable chairs and complimentary refreshments, I can't see how anyone could claim the business paying for a few hours use would be inappropriate to get some work done. But if you could pay 50% of this cost to use the business class lounge which includes all the same facilities, people are saying that would be inappropriate... but it would make better business sense to pay less for the same facilities!
Playing
's advocate a bit here but the principle does strike me as sound.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
But the only reason you're having to incur an additional cost is because you've chosen to make a personal journey. Why should the business be allowed to claim for "office space" because the employee has decided not to use the perfectly good office space he has at home/workOriginally posted by d000hg View PostYes but we're not talking about the journey, we're talking about additional costs once I'm already making the trip...
If my sole purpose for the upgrade is to give me an acceptable working environment, then isn't that by definition a business purpose?
If I were flying on holiday and an airport offered "hire by the hour office space" with hot-desks including free internet, comfortable chairs and complimentary refreshments, I can't see how anyone could claim the business paying for a few hours use would be inappropriate to get some work done. But if you could pay 50% of this cost to use the business class lounge which includes all the same facilities, people are saying that would be inappropriate... but it would make better business sense to pay less for the same facilities!
Playing
's advocate a bit here but the principle does strike me as sound.
Comment
-
You could say the same if I chose to rent an office when I have a perfectly serviceable home! And by that logic, even paying for WiFi on a train would be wrong because I didn't need to be on the train.Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostBut the only reason you're having to incur an additional cost is because you've chosen to make a personal journey. Why should the business be allowed to claim for "office space" because the employee has decided not to use the perfectly good office space he has at home/work
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Not really - having an office space for a business is wholly and exclusively for business purposes. Upgrading to first class in order to work isn't wholly and exclusively for the business because the reason you're there in the first place is because you're making a personal journey.Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou could say the same if I chose to rent an office when I have a perfectly serviceable home! And by that logic, even paying for WiFi on a train would be wrong because I didn't need to be on the train.Comment
-
If you think you can justify the costs to HMRC then claim them just don't be surprised if they don't agree with your logic. Obviously we'll be suitably sympathetic if it all goes hideously wrongOriginally posted by d000hg View PostYou could say the same if I chose to rent an office when I have a perfectly serviceable home! And by that logic, even paying for WiFi on a train would be wrong because I didn't need to be on the train.
Comment
-
I will!Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostIf you think you can justify the costs to HMRC then claim them just don't be surprised if they don't agree with your logic. Obviously we'll be suitably sympathetic if it all goes hideously wrong
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I agree with the other posters here, claiming for these expenses could be a difficult one to justify to HMRC.
Are the tax savings enough to put yourself at risk of an investigation.Comment
-
Comment
-
I have often thought you're a big softy reallyOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostI will!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment