• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

renumeration trusts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by jbryce View Post
    These are expensive things to run, the scheme will take <15%, pay HMRC minimal tax and transfer a lot of money into your account.

    You will be happy, it's minimal hassle and you'll sleep at night.

    Then HMRC will come calling, it won't matter if, at the finer level of law, the scheme is effective or not -the GAAR will probably, at some point, rule it as an avoidance scheme. The fact that these schemes have been running for 20 years will not stop HMRC addressing them at some point.

    HMRC will pursue you and you will pay them a lot of money. You may, one day, get your day in court - but by that point you will have lost your house.

    For a flavour of what will happen, read all the posts under scheme enquiries. If anyone joins one of these schemes after reading the posts there, then they are truly , truly f***ing stupid.


    so why is it that someone like Bernie can get away with millions and I cant even hide a few notes.

    Justice is just not blind

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by css_jay99 View Post
      so why is it that someone like Bernie can get away with millions and I cant even hide a few notes.

      Justice is just not blind
      Because Bernie has the money to pay for top notch lawyers and tax experts who set up bespoke trusts and schemes with his specific circumstances in mind, rather than "buying" an off the shelf scheme that has the main intention of making the scheme-providers rich. Probably costs him a fortune to get things in place, but you get what you pay for.
      ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View Post
        Because Bernie has the money to pay for top notch lawyers and tax experts who set up bespoke trusts and schemes with his specific circumstances in mind, rather than "buying" an off the shelf scheme that has the main intention of making the scheme-providers rich. Probably costs him a fortune to get things in place, but you get what you pay for.
        Add to that the fact that Bernie's lawyers will fight HMRC every step of the way, are probably better resourced and experienced than those of HMRC and HMRC know they are a long way from a guaranteed win in the courts meaning they could spend another few years and a few million fighting the case and walk away with nothing.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DaveB View Post
          Add to that the fact that Bernie's lawyers will fight HMRC every step of the way, are probably better resourced and experienced than those of HMRC and HMRC know they are a long way from a guaranteed win in the courts meaning they could spend another few years and a few million fighting the case and walk away with nothing.
          The deal made was the equivalent of a bloke with a flash car paying the local kids a few quid to stop hanging around drooling over it. Here's a tenner, now **** off and stop bothering me.
          "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by css_jay99 View Post
            so why is it that someone like Bernie can get away with millions and I cant even hide a few notes.

            Justice is just not blind
            Ecclestone saved a reputed £1 BILLION in tax with his deal...so in theory, he could still afford to pay out several hundred million quid on legal fees, top notch advice, etc, and still be quids in, as HMRC can't compete with that.

            Us mere mortals, on the other hand...now there's a different story altogether...

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by captainham View Post
              Ecclestone saved a reputed £1 BILLION in tax with his deal...so in theory, he could still afford to pay out several hundred million quid on legal fees, top notch advice, etc, and still be quids in, as HMRC can't compete with that.

              Us mere mortals, on the other hand...now there's a different story altogether...
              I'd quite happily settle with HMRC on the same terms - I'll give you one payment equivalent to the amount I earn in interest every six weeks, and you let me off my tax bills for the rest of my life.
              Best Forum Advisor 2014
              Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
              Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

              Comment


                #17
                I suggest reading the judgement on the Boyle case, paraphrasing the judges decision, if you receive some cash in your bank account as a result of being a contractor then it should be taxed as PAYE.

                There was lots of stuff about foreign loans, which devalued and so on which was more or less completely ignored by the judges. The only thing that was relevant was how much was paid into his account.

                Any scheme whatever it's called is going to fail.
                I'm alright Jack

                Comment

                Working...
                X