• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Is £10k the optimal 2014/15 salary when 10% dividend tax credit is factored in?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    How do you work that out?
    He incorrectly spelled 'their' as 'there'. He didn't misuse the word 'there'. To put another way:

    'there' in this case is not an incorrect usage of the meaning 'at (or to) that place' but an incorrect spelling of the word 'their' (meaning 'belonging to them').

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
      He incorrectly spelled 'their' as 'there'. He didn't misuse the word 'there'. To put another way:

      'there' in this case is not an incorrect usage of the meaning 'at (or to) that place' but an incorrect spelling of the word 'their' (meaning 'belonging to them').
      I will come up with an appropriate webpage from google to prove I am right, I am on page 32 with 80k results so might take me awhile but I will find one to back me up

      Now time to
      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
        I will come up with an appropriate webpage from google to prove I am right, I am on page 32 with 80k results so might take me awhile but I will find one to back me up

        Now time to
        Hands up who has a Latin degree.

        Hands up who is a low grade techie.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Andrew@NymanLinden View Post
          The salary level decision wasn't actually taken by me personally, but having done a quick review at the time I thought it was the correct one. Same approach has been taken by crunch I believe.

          If I have made a mistake then of course I'd happily admit it, I will reconsider our position on this in light of the discussions - there I've said it!

          I still stand by my position that knowing my clients better than anyone on here, for the sake of a maximum of £165 it is not worth it for them.

          Wanted to also comment that of course, it's very easy for some other accountants here to jump on the bandwagon to try and portray me/us in a further negative light - without actually giving any constructive comments, it doesn't really help to show that you are providing a quality, professional service.

          I'm going to review some exciting accounts now - as much as I would love to stay on the forum all day, I do (believe it or not) have a day job to do.

          Andrew
          Hi Andrew,

          I have only just seen this post as I was out of the office yesterday afternoon.

          I'm not sure if the comment above was aimed towards me however I would just like to point out that I was not trying to portray you or your company in a negative light - I only felt it necessary to challenge your view for the simple reason that a number of our clients are on this forum and they could have been led to believe that the advice we have given them is incorrect based on what you had said.

          Martin

          Comment

          Working...
          X