90% Retention!

[stek]

This dropped in my inbox, 90% retention after all taxes and fees!!!

Wow!!!

Seriously though, how can they get away with it? Guess the answer is in the EBT sticky above...

w ww.income-management.co.uk/index.html

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

This dropped in my inbox, 90% retention after all taxes and fees!!!

Wow!!!

Seriously though, how can they get away with it? Guess the answer is in the EBT sticky above...

w ww.income-management.co.uk/index.html]Income Management

Well they've got QC opinion.........................of course it could be on whether cheese can be used to make hats................

[cojak]

Little fish don't think, they just bite.

I'm amazed the Gov/HMRC haven't found a way to stop providers closing down schemes when the net is full and make them liable for compensation if enquiries are successful - this nonsense and the resulting flood of enquiries would stop if they did.

[cojak]

And anyone performing just a little bit of due diligence will have some pertinent questions to ask the owner of the website, (starting with the legal disclosures required of a business website, and the description on WHOIS)...

[nevergiveup]

Where do I sign up? (NOT!)

[kal]

And anyone performing just a little bit of due diligence will have some pertinent questions to ask the owner of the website, (starting with the legal disclosures required of a business website, and the description on WHOIS)...

Looks like it was put together in the early 90's by a 16 year old 'webmaster'...

[centurian]

Well they've got QC opinion.........................of course it could be on whether cheese can be used to make hats................

No, they do confirm that the QC opinion is on their structures.

Of course, they don't say what the opinion is - it could be "well, if you assume a, b & c while managing to avoid d, e & f, factoring in p, q & r while bearing in mind x, y & z, then I am confident (i.e. 51% likely) that the scheme is successful"

[centurian]

And anyone performing just a little bit of due diligence will have some pertinent questions to ask the owner of the website, (starting with the legal disclosures required of a business website, and the description on WHOIS)...

I had to look

Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

No, they do confirm that the QC opinion is on their structures.

Of course, they don't say what the opinion is - it could be "well, if you assume a, b & c while managing to avoid d, e & f, factoring in p, q & r while bearing in mind x, y & z, then I am confident (i.e. 51% likely) that the scheme is successful"

Yep you'd certainly trust all your hard earned cash with that wouldn't you

[GillsMan]

Their logo looks like it's a rip off of another company's logo. Can't quite picture which one, but it looks relatively similar to me...