• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Limited Company in IR35

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by LandRover View Post
    IR35 business entity tests published | AccountingWEB

    Finance Bill could spell the end of IR35

    http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pers...s_and_IR35.pdf

    Changes to ‘IR35’ legislation

    The Government has announced changes to the intermediaries legislation (commonly called IR35) that will impact individuals who hold an office (an executive or non-executive director) on the board of a company and are paid via a personal service company (PSC). Historically, there has been a view that income received by a PSC does not fall within the existing IR35 legislation and is therefore not treated as employment income subject to PAYE. The changes announced today will bring individuals who hold an office through a PSC within the scope of the IR35 legislation.

    From 6 April 2013 any payment to a PSC from a third party for the provision of an individual as an ‘office holder’ will be deemed to be employment income whether the PSC or the individual is registered as the office holder of the engager. This means that HMRC can invoke IR35 and seek recovery of tax under PAYE from the PSC when PAYE has not already been applied. This places office holders in the same position as contractors and other workers that currently have to apply IR35
    I thought the office holder argument was a slightly different kettle of fish to us? Was for the like of that senior guy at the student loans who had the ability to direct the organisation, not small LTD;s?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      I thought the office holder argument was a slightly different kettle of fish to us? Was for the like of that senior guy at the student loans who had the ability to direct the organisation, not small LTD;s?
      Actually, re-reading it it could be that "office holder" means someone who owns a limited company, i.e. all of us. Fook knows what goes on inside HMRC/the government's heads.
      Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1t

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by kingcook View Post
        Actually, re-reading it it could be that "office holder" means someone who owns a limited company, i.e. all of us. Fook knows what goes on inside HMRC/the government's heads.
        See para 8 IR35 forum minutes Jan, HMRC have confirmed that's cock up not conspiracy.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by kingcook View Post
          Actually, re-reading it it could be that "office holder" means someone who owns a limited company, i.e. all of us. Fook knows what goes on inside HMRC/the government's heads.
          But I thought that argument had been had and it wasn't or did I miss something? I thought the company in question was the client.

          So far the definition is

          Expert’s Answer: Whilst there is no statutory definition of 'office holder', there is a judicial definition of 'office' that is referred to in HMRC's status manual as a 'permanent, substantive position which had an existence independent from the person who filled it, which went on and was filled in succession by successive holders.'
          from Contractors' Questions: Who are 'office holders
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #25
            My understanding this is for public sector appointments and that an office holder is someone who on the governments pay scale is on the equivalent of a managerial grade. I think it was something around £223 a day. It applied if you are there for more than 6 months. My last gig was public sector and this had been brewing and they messed around getting my contract ready for review. I got given it on the last day of my previous 6 months, took the following monday off to get it reviewed and then didn't go back. There were too many red lights for me to say I was outside IR35. Not long after everyone else left when they were asked to provide evidence they were making their deemed payment or to subject themselves to HMRCs business entity tests.
            a) Noone had made deemed payments as they up to that point had considered themselves outside IR35
            b) If, for an example, you took the business entity test as a market trader, plumber, mobile car mechanic or even an IT contractor, you will come up as high risk, or medium if you do a few things like a business plan and your own invoicing. Unless you have done a subsitution, or lost 10% of your turn over on bad debt, or rent a premises you don't need, you can get enough points to be low risk.
            Signed sealed and delivered.

            Comment


              #26
              Why do I bother....

              "Office Holder" in this context has legal force. It is someone who occupies a substantive and enduring post within an organsiation, such as MD, CEO, CIO, whatever, and who has a direct say in the operation of that organisaiton. Apart from a very few independent interim managers, a freelance consultant ain't it.

              £220 a day is the bottom of the payscales for Senior Civil Servant (itself a defined role, come to that) divided by 260. It is a good indicator of the incompetence at the heart of hte Treasury that this has been set as the baseline. It should have been based on the cost of employment, not the headline salary, and should therefore be at least £450.

              Finally, it's up to the individual department to decide how to implement the Alexander horsefeathers, many seem to be taking the pragmatic view, quite a few are over-egging it, Student Loans - who started it all - are seriously taking the mickey (but then, if they had any real business intelligence, they wouldn't have got themselves in that position in the first place)
              Blog? What blog...?

              Comment

              Working...
              X