I am a professional web developer who has been contracting since 2008 and of all the clients I've worked for, none of them have come back and said that the work was substandard or that i have been negligent in terms of my ability to do the work that was required of me. In fact, most have written recommendations on LinkedIn as to my capacity to deliver and one place even offered me a permanent job.
However, in the last 6 months or so I did some work for a client through an agency who found me the contract. Not the easiest of clients and they had no technical knowledge so they were completely reliant on me to provide my input and expertise on all things technical. They even said to me once that they thought changes to the application were easy to which I responded that nothing is easy, just challenging and different.
Having finished with them they have now hired another contractor who has told them that he has had to rewrite sections of the application, that it is susceptible to hacking, other changes should have been implemented and that there are still some bugs in the application.
The client has taken this that I have not done my job properly and has not paid my last invoice and will perhaps seek to recoup some of the costs of my time. What is also worth mentioning is that I inherited the application from a third party who had probably completed 80% of it and the lines of where his work ended And mine stArted would indeed be very hazy. For example, if this contractor is claiming that the website can be hacked, who takes the responsibility for that if indeed it is hacked, is it negligence on my part or with the guy who built the website in the first place. Arguably, my code is only as good as the foundation on which it runs.
To that end, I am concerned that the client will issue legal proceedings against me claiming that I have not delivered the services that were asked of me.
Would anyone else like to pass their comments on this And indeed if you have been in a similar situation?
Thanks for reading.
However, in the last 6 months or so I did some work for a client through an agency who found me the contract. Not the easiest of clients and they had no technical knowledge so they were completely reliant on me to provide my input and expertise on all things technical. They even said to me once that they thought changes to the application were easy to which I responded that nothing is easy, just challenging and different.
Having finished with them they have now hired another contractor who has told them that he has had to rewrite sections of the application, that it is susceptible to hacking, other changes should have been implemented and that there are still some bugs in the application.
The client has taken this that I have not done my job properly and has not paid my last invoice and will perhaps seek to recoup some of the costs of my time. What is also worth mentioning is that I inherited the application from a third party who had probably completed 80% of it and the lines of where his work ended And mine stArted would indeed be very hazy. For example, if this contractor is claiming that the website can be hacked, who takes the responsibility for that if indeed it is hacked, is it negligence on my part or with the guy who built the website in the first place. Arguably, my code is only as good as the foundation on which it runs.
To that end, I am concerned that the client will issue legal proceedings against me claiming that I have not delivered the services that were asked of me.
Would anyone else like to pass their comments on this And indeed if you have been in a similar situation?
Thanks for reading.
Comment