Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The UK is the only country that I'm aware of which allows so much abuse. You know the "I haven't given you any money, it's a loan from the Cayman Islands, wink wink nudge nudge", and a judge would actually accept it.
In any other country a judge would take a pragmatic view say "what a bloody cheek" slam his hammer down and tell you to pay your tax.
The UK badly needs to have this same approach because the only winners are accountants running tax schemes, and I think something like GAAR is the only way.
Just look the amount of ruined contractors to see what clever tax planners achieve. Sure some get away with it most of them it's just havoc.
I don't see this impinging on "honest" umbrella schemes or contractors running Ltd.
The UK is the only country that I'm aware of which allows so much abuse. You know the "I haven't given you any money, it's a loan from the Cayman Islands, wink wink nudge nudge", and a judge would actually accept it.
In any other country a judge would take a pragmatic view say "what a bloody cheek" slam his hammer down and tell you to pay your tax.
The UK badly needs to have this same approach because the only winners are accountants running tax schemes, and I think something like GAAR is the only way.
Just look the amount of ruined contractors to see what clever tax planners achieve. Sure some get away with it most of them it's just havoc.
I don't see this impinging on "honest" umbrella schemes or contractors running Ltd.
I think that you are right that we need something to stop take the p*** avoidance but it worries me that legislation would be based on HMR&C guidance rather than the other way round i.e. at the moment HMR&C guidelines are based on legal precedents
Comment