No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

[Ninja]

Dead link

HMRC's ongoing vendetta against Montpelier

HMRC hoodwinked Parliament in to passing unprecedented draconian retrospective legislation. There have been unlawful raids on Montpelier's offices. Arrests without charge. Clients and staff interviewed under caution. Then the collapse of WG's trial.

There is further evidence in this recent FTT case. Note how HMRC attempted to treat Montpelier clients far more harshly than other promoters. It didn't work because the FTT ruled against them.

http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.go...64/TC04286.pdf

HMRC probably only did a deal with George because we was a deGraaf client, not Montpelier.

I don't think it is any coincidence that we are the first contractors to receive APNs. And this is despite the fact that HMRC know full well they are chancing their arm issuing them to us because the Montpelier scheme was not notifiable under DOTAS.

Can someone tell me what's in the pdf? The link is dead

[nevergiveup]

Another great NTRT newsletter. Anyone who hasn't joinned, you must be mad (or rich).

Thanks again to all the guys for all their hard work!!!!!



NGU

[bollox]

what exactly is the "Agency argument" mentioned in the news letter?

[lucozade]

Very disappointed to hear the ECHR application was "dismissed" what happened ?

[Fireship]

Newsletter

Another newsletter deserves another donation - just made mine

[DonkeyRhubarb]

But un til an actially real APN turns up for one of us Mont p cant do anything to officially start this process as the / coming soon/ letter is not the real deal that they would need to object to

Still dont get though why some of us got a 1-4 week letter and the majoity 1-8

When the APNs turn up, Montpelier will advise us to make representations to HMRC. (This is part of the APN pseudo-appeal process.)

I think Montpelier can only apply for JR if/when HMRC reject the representations.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Can someone tell me what's in the pdf? The link is dead

Site was down earlier. Try it again now.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

what exactly is the "Agency argument" mentioned in the news letter?

It is connected with the George settlement. Can't say any more at the moment.

[OnYourBikeGB]

what exactly is the "Agency argument" mentioned in the news letter?

Probably best that we don't speculate. HMRC have in the past read out quotes from this forum, in court, to discredit our legal representation. We don't want to give them any room for manoeuvre.

[SantaClaus]

Probably best that we don't speculate. HMRC have in the past read out quotes from this forum, in court, to discredit our legal representation. We don't want to give them any room for manoeuvre.

Better put lots of colourful language in all my posts then