Originally posted by BrilloPad
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	This topic is closed.
				
				
				
				X
X
					Collapse
				
				
				
					
					
						
						
					
					
						
							
						
					
				
				
				
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
						
					
					
					
					
				- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Yep - looks like it's related to the link I posted on the previous page and dates back to the raid on their offices. It seems HMRC are going after them for fraud rather than avoidance. - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Reply from my MP :-
Sorry for not replying sooner. I have contacted Ed Balls in the hope that he would give me information that I could use when writing to the government about this measure. Unfortunately I am still awaiting his response.
I would be interested in the briefing meeting but unfortunately I have several other commitments at that time. I will try to get their before the end but I am afraid I cannot promise. I would be very interested in reading any material from the meeting before writing to the minister so please send me anything you think might be relevant.
Best wishes
Clive Efford MP
Forwarded onto carl, DR & Santa.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
My response from David Tredinnick, Conservative MP:Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostReply from my MP :-
Sorry for not replying sooner. I have contacted Ed Balls in the hope that he would give me information that I could use when writing to the government about this measure. Unfortunately I am still awaiting his response.
I would be interested in the briefing meeting but unfortunately I have several other commitments at that time. I will try to get their before the end but I am afraid I cannot promise. I would be very interested in reading any material from the meeting before writing to the minister so please send me anything you think might be relevant.
Best wishes
Clive Efford MP
Forwarded onto carl, DR & Santa.
"Dear nnnnn,
Thank you for your email.
I have in mind the meeting and will try and attend, other Parliamentary business permitting.
Kind regards,
David"
Glad I got a response, but not sure that it's a firm commitment. Finger's crossed though as this is the best way to try and get the right (true) information across.
Grip.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I assume you sent onto NTRT? I got a reply asking me to suggest to my MP that he sends his researcher instead.Originally posted by GripRacing View PostMy response from David Tredinnick, Conservative MP:
"Dear nnnnn,
Thank you for your email.
I have in mind the meeting and will try and attend, other Parliamentary business permitting.
Kind regards,
David"
Glad I got a response, but not sure that it's a firm commitment. Finger's crossed though as this is the best way to try and get the right (true) information across.
Grip.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Not quite that easy, HMRC claim they can use discovery even if returns are complete. Their reasoning: not enough information was provided for them to realise they needed to open an enquiry. Another case of HMRC are all powerfulOriginally posted by Morlock View PostYes. And they can only open an enquiry after the closure of the 12 month window by using their "discovery" protocol - which means that there must have been info missing from your return (either carelessly or deliberately). If you declare all the relevant info on your return, then there is nothing to discover, and you have a case for saying that the discovery protocol cannot be used. It makes sense to file your returns early, so that the window will close earlier.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I think the Discovery Rules state that they can use discovery where the information provided would not have been obvious to a retarded monkey.Originally posted by travellingknob View PostNot quite that easy, HMRC claim they can use discovery even if returns are complete. Their reasoning: not enough information was provided for them to realise they needed to open an enquiry. Another case of HMRC are all powerfulComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Settlement
Friend of mine used the scheme for one year in 05/06 and is being forced (by his employer) to settle a 35k liability.
Does anyone have any experience of negotiating a settlement with HMRC? Is it a case of contacting Mr Brannigan?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
What liability? I have no liability! None of us have a liability. HMRC sent me a closure notice, Montp appealed it.Originally posted by MMSguru View PostFriend of mine used the scheme for one year in 05/06 and is being forced (by his employer) to settle a 35k liability.
Does anyone have any experience of negotiating a settlement with HMRC? Is it a case of contacting Mr Brannigan?
Is your friend contract or permanent?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Settlement
Fighting is not an option for him. He has to settle. He's a contractor.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostIs your friend contract or permanent?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Originally posted by MMSguru View PostFighting is not an option for him. He has to settle. He's a contractor.
 How has his client found out about the "liability"? And how was the "liability" been incurred?
Now if HMRC were to try to enforce collection, and the appeals process runs out, then we will get a liability. This will take years. But that would not stop us working as contractors. Bankruptcy would. But we are a long long way off that.
There is alot more to this story isn't there?
Another thought - has your friend contacted NW or TQ at Montp?Comment
 
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
					
					
					
				- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment