• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by eek View Post
    It's police and Crown Prosecution Service.... Even if the former aren't involved (and they are) the latter definitely are...
    The police had no involvement. This was strictly between HMRC and the CPS.

    CPS press release last year:
    Two men charged with £1 million gift aid tax relief fraud

    HMRC must have "presented" the CPS with something pretty convincing to persuade them to prosecute.

    Comment


      HMRC as bad guys?

      ...not really been following this (new to the site and mainly arguing over referendum), but does this have any impact on the poor sods facing APNs next year?

      HMRC are outrageous.....actually would an independent Scotland be rid of them? Maybe the only reason to vote Yes....

      Anyway - I sense that someone has stuck it to the Man and that's gotta be good news

      Comment


        Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
        The police had no involvement. This was strictly between HMRC and the CPS.

        CPS press release last year:
        Two men charged with £1 million gift aid tax relief fraud

        HMRC must have "presented" the CPS with something pretty convincing to persuade them to prosecute.
        Well it's the CPS who decide whether to proceed or not. If it was me I would be making cps's live hell hoping that it would impact the others.

        I also would be looking for any newspaper quotes by hmrc and going for them for libel individually
        merely at clientco for the entertainment

        Comment


          Originally posted by jemb View Post
          ...not really been following this (new to the site and mainly arguing over referendum), but does this have any impact on the poor sods facing APNs next year?

          HMRC are outrageous.....actually would an independent Scotland be rid of them? Maybe the only reason to vote Yes....

          Anyway - I sense that someone has stuck it to the Man and that's gotta be good news
          That is precisely the reason I am voting YES next Thursday. I'm totally sickened by this corrupt Westminster/Civil Service/Judicial establishment, and totally disillusioned with the so called rule of law and British 'sense of fair play.'
          In an independent Scotland I might have a chance to prolong or maybe even escape my sentence on 'death row.' One of the first things that will happen in an independent Scotland is the creation of a Constitution - the existence of which may well have saved us from this whole retrospective legislation debacle.
          Even if I have to pay in the end, I'd rather be shafted by some of my own that this gang of two-faced, lying, hypocritical public school boys.
          I've now become completely immune to all the threats and scare-mongering by the same self-serving Westminster elite.
          Freedom!!!

          Comment


            Originally posted by reckless View Post
            That is precisely the reason I am voting YES next Thursday. I'm totally sickened by this corrupt Westminster/Civil Service/Judicial establishment, and totally disillusioned with the so called rule of law and British 'sense of fair play.'
            In an independent Scotland I might have a chance to prolong or maybe even escape my sentence on 'death row.' One of the first things that will happen in an independent Scotland is the creation of a Constitution - the existence of which may well have saved us from this whole retrospective legislation debacle.
            Even if I have to pay in the end, I'd rather be shafted by some of my own that this gang of two-faced, lying, hypocritical public school boys.
            I've now become completely immune to all the threats and scare-mongering by the same self-serving Westminster elite.
            Freedom!!!
            I wan't to become Scottish! I'm first in queue for a passport - just need to perfect that dialect.
            'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
            Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

            Comment


              Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
              The police had no involvement. This was strictly between HMRC and the CPS.

              CPS press release last year:
              Two men charged with £1 million gift aid tax relief fraud

              HMRC must have "presented" the CPS with something pretty convincing to persuade them to prosecute.
              I disagree. I think someone in the CPS was bribed with a gong. Just as well for us they could not find a suitable judge to bribe.

              Comment


                Originally posted by reckless View Post
                That is precisely the reason I am voting YES next Thursday. I'm totally sickened by this corrupt Westminster/Civil Service/Judicial establishment, and totally disillusioned with the so called rule of law and British 'sense of fair play.'
                In an independent Scotland I might have a chance to prolong or maybe even escape my sentence on 'death row.' One of the first things that will happen in an independent Scotland is the creation of a Constitution - the existence of which may well have saved us from this whole retrospective legislation debacle.
                Even if I have to pay in the end, I'd rather be shafted by some of my own that this gang of two-faced, lying, hypocritical public school boys.
                I've now become completely immune to all the threats and scare-mongering by the same self-serving Westminster elite.
                Freedom!!!
                One cannot disagree with that atall. I just hope that Scotland won't come to a reciprical arrangement with England to stick the boot into us.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  I disagree. I think someone in the CPS was bribed with a gong. Just as well for us they could not find a suitable judge to bribe.
                  WHS +1, someone from HMRC took someone from CPS to lunch and bought them a nice bottle of red.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Measured Cynic View Post
                    Prosecution did not complete their submissions but withdrew due to insufficient evidence. Jury directed to return verdict of Not Guilty
                    The case is over.
                    Just seen this. Fantastic news and a good beating over the head for those twats at HMRC.
                    I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

                    Comment


                      Vendetta

                      Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                      The police had no involvement. This was strictly between HMRC and the CPS.

                      CPS press release last year:
                      Two men charged with £1 million gift aid tax relief fraud

                      HMRC must have "presented" the CPS with something pretty convincing to persuade them to prosecute.
                      This is what I find most disconcerting. The CPS seemed convinced that a successful prosecution was likely, but the judge laughed it out of court. There is something fishy here. A simple search for Montpelier and Gittins brings back nothing but negative 'news' stories that would no doubt make prospective clients think twice. That was the aim.

                      For the prosecution to collapse so spectacularly must raise questions about the CPS relationship with HMRC.

                      This was an obvious waste of money, and the result of a vendetta. It is now down to HMRC to prove it is not.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X