Originally posted by DotasScandal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by jlg15333 View PostI hear you & I've thought about it & spoken to the editor and think we should get a fair say; after all it's in the program's interests to show how the issue of retrospection has affected people's lives. Otherwise it won't be a very thought provoking or controversial documentary about the work of a tax inspector, surely?
If they want a second series, they must keep HMRC fully on-board - they don't need to keep those affected by HMRC happy to get renewed - there will always be plenty of participants available.Comment
-
Originally posted by centurian View PostIt's not supposed to be thought provoking - it's supposed to make them a shed load of money. Everything else is just window dressing.
If they want a second series, they must keep HMRC fully on-board - they don't need to keep those affected by HMRC happy to get renewed - there will always be plenty of participants available.Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI agree with your mistrust but I can also see why BP is doing it as he has nothing to lose.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI met the director today. Indeed I have nothing to lose. Plus any dodgy questions they ask and they will only get footage they cannot use. I pointed that out to the director.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI met the director today. Indeed I have nothing to lose. Plus any dodgy questions they ask and they will only get footage they cannot use. I pointed that out to the director.
See the link. Don't forget to read page 2 as well. You might need to mention all of these that even tax law firms are against HMRC proposal and retro. These are all proof. Good luck and we are all behind you.Comment
-
Originally posted by centurian View PostIt's not supposed to be thought provoking - it's supposed to make them a shed load of money. Everything else is just window dressing.
If they want a second series, they must keep HMRC fully on-board - they don't need to keep those affected by HMRC happy to get renewed - there will always be plenty of participants available.
I think the important thing for people here to emphasis is not going to be the amount of money or the grottyness of everything but the fact this has been going on for over 10 years and still no resolution in place.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by Safe View PostInternational Adviser: Tax expert labels HMRC proposals 'unconstitutional'
See the link. Don't forget to read page 2 as well. You might need to mention all of these that even tax law firms are against HMRC proposal and retro. These are all proof. Good luck and we are all behind you.Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostTo be fair to HMRC they just abide by government policy.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fireship View PostHmm, might be true for APN's etc but that's certainly not the case when HMRC were busily bastardising Hansard to get S58 passed!!
The truth being they act like total nazis, issuing threatening and accusatory letters at the drop of a hat (my wife got one telling her she was "negligent" and threatened her with a penalty for incorrect SA, might have been nicer to ask her to recheck her calcs maybe???!!!!)
I Wonder how many of the treasury have ever been on the receiving end of an HMRC threatening letter, which by the way can be the first communication they ever have with an individual. Lovely bunch....
They call us "customers", blimey their PR team need to be taken out of the dark ages and maybe learn the concept of a customer always being right, at least until proven wrong not the other way round!
RANT OVER!!!for now at least....
Last edited by smalldog; 24 June 2014, 21:12.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment