• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The great IR35 swindlle

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Exactly why do you think people join the PCG?
    When my membership lapsed they phoned and focused strongly on how I was not insured against IR35 any more.
    And they push the point on their site, you MUST avoid gaps in your membership to be covered. They are CLEARLY using IR35 advice/protection as a strong aspect of their value to contractors.
    That raises two questions:

    1) If this IR35 risk even exists. For most of us it doesn't

    2) Is making people fearful to get renewals a good thing.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
      Hmm.

      If you are currently LTD, then you'd pay ~10% more tax to go self employed, even more if you are engaging in a few tax avoidance measures like retaining funds in the company for a rainy day or income splitting. For the incorporated worker, they would leave themselves open to unlimited liability as self employed too. Big win for HMRC - 10% more tax coming in but I can't see it catching on.

      I don't see that adding up to 99% of contractors, somehow. The hassle of running a company can be easily mitigated by hiring an accountant to do it all for you.

      If you are currently umbrella then you would pay ~13% less tax (no employer's NI) if you went self employed. Big loss to HMRC. A fair number of self employed people wouldn't pay tax at all, work for a year or two and then leave the country while others would under declare their earnings and have no money when HMRC eventually caught up with them. Big enforcement headache and more loss for HMRC.
      I wish govt would integrate the rates, so self-employed pretty much matched the small companies corp tax rate. Bump small companies corp tax to 29% for a start.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by richy View Post
        I wish govt would integrate the rates, so self-employed pretty much matched the small companies corp tax rate. Bump small companies corp tax to 29% for a start.
        Do you ever wonder why they don't do this? Do you ever consider that perhaps they would like to encourage small businesses (including freelancers) and therefore keep the taxes low?
        Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

        Comment


          #44
          Hi

          Originally posted by v8gaz View Post
          Also, campaign such as taking a few full page ads out to change public (and therefore MP) perception on the value of contractors aint cheap - a full page ad in a heavyweight paper is around 250k.
          Yup, Sunday Telegraph Biz supplement Page 6 yesterday. Half page, so they've blown 125k of your money! doh.

          "A vital role that deserves recognition". As someone who works in this sector, I don't really see where they are coming from. Contracts come up for tender because of the flexibility, ease of getting in talent, and ease of dropping it when projects end.


          Originally posted by v8gaz View Post
          All in all PCG is bloody good value -however they could do a lot more if the coat-tail hangers on (the ones that get the intangible benefits for free) would stup up a tenner a month (what's that, what you earn for the first Monday dump of the month?) and join up.
          I've not seen any benefits of PCG myself. Have I missed something good?

          PCG should switch, and campaign for increasing corp tax so it matches self-employed, then there will be no benefit from ltd co structure. Or bring NI+Income tax down as towards the small ltd co corp tax rate..

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by richy View Post
            Hi



            Yup, Sunday Telegraph Biz supplement Page 6 yesterday. Half page, so they've blown 125k of your money! doh.

            "A vital role that deserves recognition". As someone who works in this sector, I don't really see where they are coming from. Contracts come up for tender because of the flexibility, ease of getting in talent, and ease of dropping it when projects end.
            Don't understand. Your market - and hence your job - exists because of that flexibility. Your point eludes me completely.

            I've not seen any benefits of PCG myself. Have I missed something good?
            Like I said earlier, the benefits are horribly intangible, but nontheless real. Without PCG's lobbying you would be in a far worse state than we are now, not that that's particularly good.

            PCG should switch, and campaign for increasing corp tax so it matches self-employed, then there will be no benefit from ltd co structure. Or bring NI+Income tax down as towards the small ltd co corp tax rate..
            I wish I lived in your world, it sounds nice...


            But explain why making us uncompetitive and erasing the margins we get for being freelance and carrying all that extra risk and costs is a good idea. I'm buggered if I can work out your logic.
            Blog? What blog...?

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by malvolio View Post
              But explain why making us uncompetitive and erasing the margins we get for being freelance and carrying all that extra risk and costs is a good idea. I'm buggered if I can work out your logic.
              Are you meaning that client co should pay the same total amount for a permie, or an external, and the external gets more take-home simply because of ltd co structure?

              I don't think we need taxation differences to be competitive.

              Clients pay more for external talent because they need it, and it's usually pretty short-term. They pay more than they would for a permie. That addition money they put in, gives the external more money. It's not a just taxation rate difference than gives the external more money. I'd rather the taxation rates were similar between different trading structures, so it became more about the talent, and what people bring to the team, than how they were incorporated or self-employed, or even VAT registered etc.

              The accountants, taxmen, industry advisory groups and solicitors are profiting due to current system

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by richy View Post
                Are you meaning that client co should pay the same total amount for a permie, or an external, and the external gets more take-home simply because of ltd co structure?

                I don't think we need taxation differences to be competitive.

                Clients pay more for external talent because they need it, and it's usually pretty short-term. They pay more than they would for a permie. That addition money they put in, gives the external more money. It's not a just taxation rate difference than gives the external more money. I'd rather the taxation rates were similar between different trading structures, so it became more about the talent, and what people bring to the team, than how they were incorporated or self-employed, or even VAT registered etc.

                The accountants, taxmen, industry advisory groups and solicitors are profiting due to current system
                OK. One small detail. The cost of employment of a contractor is lower than that of a permie. Taxation of the individual is not a factor.

                HTH
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by richy View Post
                  Are you meaning that client co should pay the same total amount for a permie, or an external, and the external gets more take-home simply because of ltd co structure?

                  I don't think we need taxation differences to be competitive.

                  Clients pay more for external talent because they need it, and it's usually pretty short-term. They pay more than they would for a permie. That addition money they put in, gives the external more money. It's not a just taxation rate difference than gives the external more money. I'd rather the taxation rates were similar between different trading structures, so it became more about the talent, and what people bring to the team, than how they were incorporated or self-employed, or even VAT registered etc.

                  The accountants, taxmen, industry advisory groups and solicitors are profiting due to current system
                  Had you considered the financial risks that contractors have v permies??? It's guaranteed, protected income compared to income from work that has to be sourced by the individual (and not always successfully)
                  Connect with me on LinkedIn

                  Follow us on Twitter.

                  ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
                    Had you considered the financial risks that contractors have v permies??? It's guaranteed, protected income compared to income from work that has to be sourced by the individual (and not always successfully)
                    I think the same Contract should be around twice what a perm would get to cover the fact that is not guaranteed.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                      OK. One small detail. The cost of employment of a contractor is lower than that of a permie. Taxation of the individual is not a factor.

                      HTH
                      I'd rather taxation was out of the question, sadly it's not, we're in the IR35 thread, and its divs vs PAYE.

                      Re Engaging a contractor being lower than a permie, got any figures or links about that? I'm intrigued!

                      All the contracts I've been on have been paid around double what a perm would get, they don't make that back up in NI or pension contribs.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X