Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The annuity rates have halved over the past decade or so, and with the expected increase in life expectancy and low interest rates, I can only see that the annuity rates will fall further over the next decade.
Pensions and how they are structured are too much out of my control to place my future plans around one. I am saving for my retirement through ISA's and other methods, I recall reading that the overall tax savings are similar. I think it was based on that although pension contributions have tax relief, the income is full taxable, whereas with ISA's the tax situation is reversed, ie the capital has no tax relief but the income and capital gains are tax free.
I have yet to hear an pension man convince me that my argument above is not valid.
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." Cicero
I have yet to hear an pension man convince me that my argument above is not valid.
I can't convince you but I was convinced when someone went though the benefits of spreading your savings. Over the last few decades many schemes have started and sold as the golden age of investments and most have changed either for the worse or better. People were investing in their houses as their pensions and look where that is now, endowment mortgages promising early repayments and so on and so on. I agree pensions may have fallen by the wayside in the face of competition from other newer systems. Where will these be in 2 decades? I certainly don't know and plan on spreading my risk. One of these is in a pension so am happy to but an affordable amount in there just in case. Some is in my house with is worth what I bought it for and others in my ISA's which are climbing slowly etc etc.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
I'd second northernladuk. A pension still has very good tax breaks attached to it. However I wouldn't sink all my money into it and I'd pay careful attention to fees/charges and what it is invested in. In terms of my own investing activity I put a fair bit into a pension, an ISA and I overpay my mortgage. You really cannot tell how things are going to pan out. Pensions and shares in general have been in the doldrums for ages but when would you want to invest? When things are cheap!
People complain about having no control over their pension but in reality most of us don't have control over our investments. What happens if a massive waste recycling site is build in the field behind your house? What happens if future governments decide to plug the black hole in their finances by enacting land tax? We've seen it happen to pensions with Brown. It is not inconceivable that Milliband, Cameron or some other future leader might decide to raid the housing store of wealth.
The annuity rates have halved over the past decade or so, and with the expected increase in life expectancy and low interest rates, I can only see that the annuity rates will fall further over the next decade.
Pensions and how they are structured are too much out of my control to place my future plans around one. I am saving for my retirement through ISA's and other methods, I recall reading that the overall tax savings are similar. I think it was based on that although pension contributions have tax relief, the income is full taxable, whereas with ISA's the tax situation is reversed, ie the capital has no tax relief but the income and capital gains are tax free.
I have yet to hear an pension man convince me that my argument above is not valid.
One thing that does skew the argument is NI savings. This is significant if your are in a position of having a higher salary. If you are effectively paying pension contributions from dividends then it is neutral.
Your points regarding annuity rates are fair. However it is currently the case that with pensions they are now much more flexible with how the benefits are paid, income draw down etc are all possible now in certain circumstances. Whether a pension is the right answer for anybody simply depends upon their own position and circumstances.
In australia they have self-managed pensions... or as they call it Self Managed Superannuation Funds. It is all regulated but you can basically have your own super fund invest in BTL or whatever you choose.
If they had that here, I'd buy into the pension argument in a big way.
In australia they have self-managed pensions... or as they call it Self Managed Superannuation Funds. It is all regulated but you can basically have your own super fund invest in BTL or whatever you choose.
If they had that here, I'd buy into the pension argument in a big way.
I must look into it then, although my plans about future residence make anything difficult for me.
Am I right in taking a previous comment that the max is 50k per year but can be carried forward?
So if i set up a SIPP now and don't put any money in it for 10 years, I can in theory put 500k into it in year 11 ?
No. The carry forward rules are not that simple. You cannot carry forward from a time at which you are not a scheme member, you can only carry forward unused contributions for a maximum of 3 years. I believe employer contributions cannot be carried forward at all which can further complicate things if an employee and employer both contribute.
In terms of the question you posed you could set up a sipp now, make a fairly nominal contribution if needed and then pay in 150k in 3 years. Though it also depends on where you are resident.
In the right circumstances (not too far from retirement, modest cashflow requirements/high earning spouse), I think there is much to be said for the "Use your company as a quasi-pension" strategy.
Eg, earn £100K pa (say). After adjusting for flat rate VAT, paying a salary and some expenses, you might end up with profit before tax of £90K. Pay CT of £18K and a divi of £32K leaves retained profits of £40K pa. Accumulate this until you retire, say 15 years. You now have £600K in your company.
The obvious thing to do is to pay CGT of £60K and walk away with £540K. The alternative would be to carry on paying dividends to H & W (both now retired, no other income) of £38K each per annum for 8 years.
Or do 12 months working full-time abroad and pay it out as a tax-free divi (you obviously have to go to the right place to avoid local tax so probably only an option for that kind of money if it fits in with your retirement plans anyway).
Comment