Originally posted by Lala
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Court of Appeal and beyond
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
Last edited by smalldog; 23 February 2012, 09:42. -
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostOne other thing to stress, that if the original case given to us by HMRC was correct, that we were in the wrong, then we would have exited the scheme and paid what was due at that point. It's entrapment because the advice they offered caused us, even encouraged us, to stay in the scheme. It is not entrapment if their action made no difference, i.e. if we would have stayed in regardless. Entrapment is also as far as I know, only applicable in a criminal case, but their motives were the same.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostFrom what I've read hmrc are generally hell bent on making things as bas as humanly possible. Reasons I suspect being to make sure you don't ever think of straying from the path again and to inflict a form of punishment for stepping out of line. Logic and reason around the cost of bankrupting you vs. the money to be yielded is not a consideration it seems. So don't think cos you have no discernible assets your safe.
If you don't have any assets, they cant take anything from you and the debt will eventually be written off. If you do have assets such as a house, you have more to lose.
Also, from what I understand, once your affairs are in the hands of the bankruptcy court, HMRC will be just one of a long line of creditors with no preferential treatment over the others.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostHowever, the worse off you are, the more bankruptcy will benefit you.
If you don't have any assets, they cant take anything from you and the debt will eventually be written off. If you do have assets such as a house, you have more to lose.
Also, from what I understand, once your affairs are in the hands of the bankruptcy court, HMRC will be just one of a long line of creditors with no preferential treatment over the others.
Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Bankruptcy
This is an excellent booklet produced by the charity TaxAid.
http://taxaid.org.uk/wp-content/uplo...t-Nov-2011.pdf
See page 22 - "Bankruptcy is good for some people"Comment
-
Originally posted by Emigre View PostAnd of course, anyone on a loan scheme may have quite a large accumulated loan by now...
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostThings worth highlighting on top of those already mentioned are that HMRC were never able to tell us what we had done wrong, even though we asked. At all times we were open and honest. The one time that HMRC did quote case law, they were wrong, and quoted a case that actually backed our position.
They tried, they stalled, they lied, they failed! Tax position clear!!! HMRC didn’t have a leg to stand on, we knew it, they knew it, so they went away and invented a whole new argument, one that didn’t even exist and needed a time machine to make it so!!!
Surely there has to be a case to answer given that that HMRC didn’t have a legal argument so had to invent one? The law as it stood meant we had done nothing wrong, years of stalling and intimidation whilst knowing there is no reason for it is nothing short of persecution!Comment
-
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostSome very good points there, OnYourBikeGB. The "entrapment" angle is a big one - the fact that HMRC delayed the process by 7 years to trap us into huge debts and interest charges could not be classed as fair by anyone, especially when the goalposts have moved.
They had knowledge of what they were doing, we didn’t, and it was HMRC who asked if we as a group would be willing to wait for the outcome of those cases!!! Entrapment pure and simple!!
If they had disclosed the facts, i.e. we’re cooking up retro and the test cases will never make it to court, however if you demand a hearing before then the outcome will be very different – what do you think would’ve happened???
The fact is they lied and had no intention of going before a tax tribunal, they merely wanted to ensure that we didn’t!Comment
-
wow
well interesting times ahead, i havent posted on here since i left the UK in may 2010, mate sent me a message with a copy of the letter.... which will get to my address here in Aus (yes HMRC have my address here, im not hiding or running)
for me my investments are worth tulip all due to the global recession, i havent earned a proper income since 2010 as ive been building a new business and living off the wifes $$
i to are just going to wait n see what happens with MP, then if worse comes to worse, ill just have to pay a little bit over the next 200 yearsWhen is comes to the HMRC and Gordy. Im a fighter not a loverComment
-
Originally posted by travellingknob View PostWhy on earth is everyone worried about bankruptcy ? Tax is the only thing that does not get wiped out when your bankrupt. HMRC will obviously carry on collecting the outstanding tax a rate you can afford to pay for all infinity. However, they are extremy unlikely to make anyone bankrupt unless you just arent playing ball. They will always come to a deal over payment before taking such drastic action.
If I owe tax to HMRC can these debts be included bankruptcyComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Yesterday 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Comment