Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
I don't take director's loans but I did post a question about them which may be worth reading.
Possible options are:
1. Don't take a director's loan at all.

2. Take a loan but never a penny more than £5k and you (and your accountant) will have an easy life as per NLUK's suggestion. No tax, no BIK, no implications. Obviously this is not always the answer people want to hear when they've got £50k burning a hole in the company's pocket and earning 0.000001% interest in one hand and a £50k flexible mortgage debt in the other.

3. Have a board meeting (minuted) where it's decided that the director will take a big director's loan but pay it back with 4% interest before the company year end so you don't have to declare it on the company's tax return or in any case by 9 months after the year end so you don't have to pay the 25% tax charge on it. The company makes a fantastic, low risk (!) return on it's loan and the director gets a loan for a net cost of about 1%. Everyone's a winner including HMRC who get more tax out of the deal! That's got to make good business sense surely?
4. Take a big director's loan but pay it back without interest before the company year end so you don't have to declare it on the company's tax return or by 9 months after the year end so you don't have to pay the 25% tax charge on it. You may then have to pay tax on this as a benefit in kind (eg an interest free loan) and this may be more expensive than paying the interest under option 3 whereby the interest becomes company profit which you withdraw as a dividend. Can't see the attraction of this option.

5. Set up a deed of trust whereby the company puts money in your personal bank account but it's still the company's money as suggested by THEPUMA. Can't comment on this one.

The problem is that there is no straight answer and I don't think anyone is especially happy about the subject. In particular I get annoyed when I read about how HMRC "don't like" anything other than option 1 or 2 and they "may" try and force you to treat the loan as salary. However, I get the impression that if the loans are irregular and you have a formal board meeting to approve them then they can't really argue the point about it.
I also get the impression that the accountants don't want to encourage it because it 1. complicates your tax affairs and 2. there is a danger that the director will spend all the money on high living then default on the loan causing all manner of tulip to hit the fan.
Other info:
HM Revenue & Customs: Directors' loan accounts and Corporation Tax explained
HM Revenue & Customs: Beneficial loan arrangements - official rates
Comment