• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Noob SIPP question for company owners

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    That is misleading. By paying direct from the Ltd Co into the SIPP, you do not get tax relief, no. You simply do not pay any tax on that money, zero, zip, nothing to pay. As a bonus, that money is also IR35 investigation proofed too.
    Which I mentioned in my previous post, which is my I didn't mention it again. I agree about the IR35 bit too, but IR35 investigations can be done based on working practices too.
    If your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.

    Comment


      #12
      Let me make this simple: all contributions should be employer single contributions from your company. Compared to paying yourself income taxed at the basic or higher rates, out of which you pay personal contributions, paying employer contributions will give you the same or a greater reduction in your tax bill.

      Yes if you pay yourself only the personal allowance as salary then you can make a small contribution out of that and get "tax back" on money that hasn't been taxed. Getting tax relief on £3600 (or £7000?) is a sideshow when you could be avoiding tax and NI on up to £50,000, while IR35-proofing that money.
      Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 26 January 2011, 15:34.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by IR35 Avoider View Post
        Let me make this simple: all contributions should be employer single contributions from your company. Compared to paying yourself income taxed at the basic or higher rates, out of which you pay personal contributions, paying employer contributions will give you the same or a greater reduction in your tax bill.

        Yes if you pay yourself only the personal allowance as salary then you can make a small contribution out of that and get "tax back" on money that hasn't been taxed. Getting tax relief on £3600 is a sideshow when you could be avoiding tax and NI on up to £50,000, while IR35-proofing that money.
        Agreed. Even better, for every £50k you put into the SIPP, you get to take £12.5k straight out again entirely tax free (if you're over 55).
        Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
        Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

        Comment


          #14
          Some of the early replies were very misleadingly put, so let me expand on what I said earlier:-

          Money paid as employer contributions bypasses whatever combination of income tax, corporation tax and NI would otherwise apply. Money paid as personal contributions only gets income tax refunded.

          Money paid as employer contributions is IR35-proof: in respect of that money, it doesn't matter whether you are investigated. If you pay dividends and make pension contributions, the dividends can later be taxed as salary if you fail IR35.

          Comment


            #15
            I'm also looking at Pensions and the more I read the more confused I get!

            Are you all saying that pension contributions effectively reduce the CT a company pays whilst also providing a pension for the Director?

            Eg
            Turnover 120,000
            Expenses 20,000
            Profit 100,000
            Corp Tax @ 21% = 21,000

            With a pension
            Turnover 120,000
            Expenses 20,000
            Pension contribution pa 50,000
            Profit 50,000
            Corp Tax @ 21% = 10,500


            I also see that a lot have said you can only contibute up to 100% of your salary. If most pay a salary of £5k - £7k then is that the limit you can invest in a year? Surely that can't be right as no Director is going to pay themselves a salary of £50k, just to make the most of the full pension contribution allowance?

            Comment


              #16
              I'm researching this very topic now - your figures are correct as I understand it.

              I too was confused by this '100% of salary' thing, but I think as a director you can bypass that, as it can be treated as a 'business expense' rather than an actual salary payment.

              The answer appears to lie in this

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by youngguy View Post
                I'm also looking at Pensions and the more I read the more confused I get!

                Are you all saying that pension contributions effectively reduce the CT a company pays whilst also providing a pension for the Director?

                Eg
                Turnover 120,000
                Expenses 20,000
                Profit 100,000
                Corp Tax @ 21% = 21,000

                With a pension
                Turnover 120,000
                Expenses 20,000
                Pension contribution pa 50,000
                Profit 50,000
                Corp Tax @ 21% = 10,500


                I also see that a lot have said you can only contibute up to 100% of your salary. If most pay a salary of £5k - £7k then is that the limit you can invest in a year? Surely that can't be right as no Director is going to pay themselves a salary of £50k, just to make the most of the full pension contribution allowance?
                Yes - your CT calculation example is corect.

                Also, your limit when paying from the company is £50k, because this isn't a personal contribution. The limit when paying as an individual is your salary for the year.

                If in the future you are deemed to have been within IR35 then your pension payment from the company is subtracted from the revenue before other calculations are made. So if you have a revenue of 120k and pay a pension of 50k only 70k would be treated as subject to IR35.
                Loopy Loo

                Comment


                  #18
                  One question in here if I may - I am looking to set up a SIPP for myself and have the company pay into it as above, and also transfer in some other pensions I have.

                  Is there any differennce, be it legally, IR35-status or anything, between:

                  - Me setting it up myself (i.e. personally) and then effectively telling myco about it so they can make the payments
                  and
                  - Myco setting it up in my name or whatever.

                  The first seems more straight-forward, parciularly if I cease trading at some point in the (distant future).

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by imightbewrong View Post
                    One question in here if I may - I am looking to set up a SIPP for myself and have the company pay into it as above, and also transfer in some other pensions I have.

                    Is there any differennce, be it legally, IR35-status or anything, between:

                    - Me setting it up myself (i.e. personally) and then effectively telling myco about it so they can make the payments
                    and
                    - Myco setting it up in my name or whatever.

                    The first seems more straight-forward, parciularly if I cease trading at some point in the (distant future).
                    I don't know what the legal differences are between the two options. However, it's perfectly OK for your company to pay contributions into your personal pension.
                    Loopy Loo

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Stakeholder Pension Plan vs SIPP

                      Resurrecting this discussion to get some clarification.

                      1) I have my own LTD and set up a Stakeholder Pension Plan (SPP) where I pay each year up to the max 50K (40K from this coming year) whereas my annual salary is only 15K, plus dividends. I assumed it was OK and wasn't challenged by my accountant, did I get it wrong?

                      2) If I transfer my SPP into a SIPP, can I continue paying the annual 40K in the SIPP directly from the company, with the same tax advantage? (I would prefer a SIPP to reduce the costs, but only if it provides the same advantage)

                      Many thanks

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X