I have visited three accountants so far. I am slightly confused now. Because although the way they calculate the tax is pretty much the same, their charges are very different.
Company 1: The accountant said something like ‘Hopefully I only need to see you once a year’. It sent me bad signal because I am not sure if he is going to be very willing to help. He charges 1200+VAT each year. He seems to know lots about the IR35 and has offered a free IR35 reviews.
Company 2: The accountant is freelance but He is in the business for more than 20 years. He can calculate everything really fast, but is unable to explain things very well. He also seems very forgetful. But he responses really fast and is the least expensive one because he doesn’t need rent an office in the city centre. He is doing works for 9 IT contractors at the moment.
Company 3: The accountant is the most logical person among them. He can explain everything really clearly. But I felt he is doing everything' by the books' and is unwilling to find the most tax efficient way for me. He doesn’t want to do the IR35 reviews but he recommends specialists to me. He also offers unlimited business advice, so I can talk to him or meet up with him whenever I need him. But he is the most expensive one. 1400+VAT.
I prefer company 3 as he can explain everything really clearly, but I am really concerned that I am going to pay a lot more tax as he is doing everying "by the book". For example, both Company 1 and 2 mentioned that I can claim up to 75 pounds each week as office rental. But company 3 said I can only claim 3 pounds each week because I live there as well.
Company 2, only concern is that he can’t explain things really well. So I may get confused.
I have asked them to calculate the approximate tax I need to pay for this year and their results are pretty much the same. I don’t mind paying more for a good accountant. But if their caculation is the same, why should I pay double the price?
Which one shall I go for?Any advice and suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Thanks =)
Company 1: The accountant said something like ‘Hopefully I only need to see you once a year’. It sent me bad signal because I am not sure if he is going to be very willing to help. He charges 1200+VAT each year. He seems to know lots about the IR35 and has offered a free IR35 reviews.
Company 2: The accountant is freelance but He is in the business for more than 20 years. He can calculate everything really fast, but is unable to explain things very well. He also seems very forgetful. But he responses really fast and is the least expensive one because he doesn’t need rent an office in the city centre. He is doing works for 9 IT contractors at the moment.
Company 3: The accountant is the most logical person among them. He can explain everything really clearly. But I felt he is doing everything' by the books' and is unwilling to find the most tax efficient way for me. He doesn’t want to do the IR35 reviews but he recommends specialists to me. He also offers unlimited business advice, so I can talk to him or meet up with him whenever I need him. But he is the most expensive one. 1400+VAT.
I prefer company 3 as he can explain everything really clearly, but I am really concerned that I am going to pay a lot more tax as he is doing everying "by the book". For example, both Company 1 and 2 mentioned that I can claim up to 75 pounds each week as office rental. But company 3 said I can only claim 3 pounds each week because I live there as well.
Company 2, only concern is that he can’t explain things really well. So I may get confused.
I have asked them to calculate the approximate tax I need to pay for this year and their results are pretty much the same. I don’t mind paying more for a good accountant. But if their caculation is the same, why should I pay double the price?
Which one shall I go for?Any advice and suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Thanks =)
Comment