Originally posted by Olly
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Offset Mortgages
Collapse
X
-
Evading paying tax is pretty cut and dry IMO'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
There is no BIK if done properly. Whether or not the lender would allow it if they knew what was going on is a different matter but from a tax perspective it can be done without tax consequences if structured correctly.
PumaComment
-
I don't want to sign all sanctimonious here but its against the rules so you shouldn't do it. If you had "fun" with farmyard animals it wouldn't make it right just because you didn't tell the farmer.Originally posted by Olly View Postso the only way they'd know is if they were told be the person benefiting...hmmmComment
-
How would you be evading tax?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostEvading paying tax is pretty cut and dry IMOmerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostHow would you be evading tax?This would insinuate that the person benefiting may not tell them. Not telling them would mean you evading tax if due.so the only way they'd know is if they were told be the person benefiting...hmmm'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by THEPUMA View PostThere is no BIK if done properly. Whether or not the lender would allow it if they knew what was going on is a different matter but from a tax perspective it can be done without tax consequences if structured correctly.
Puma
Could you explain further - this sounds interesting.Beer
is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin FranklinComment
-
You really need to understand how the inland revenue treat an offset mortgage before talking about these things.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThis would insinuate that the person benefiting may not tell them. Not telling them would mean you evading tax if due.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I probably do you are right. I read what you write and that was a comment about them only knowing if you tell them. That seems pretty generic and clear in it's insinutation, offset mortgages, BIK, dodgy expenses etc. Don't tell them then they don't know which isn't clever. It appeared to me that you saw an option of not declaring something when you are required to do so which was the basis of my responses. My apologies if I have misread your responseOriginally posted by eek View PostYou really need to understand how the inland revenue treat an offset mortgage before talking about these things.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Is clyseldale still doing this then? Did you sign up to that? I had a good look and could not findOriginally posted by Just1morethen View PostAdvocate, its genuinely not me.
Olly, its the Clydesdale Bank but I suspect that it may be a ill-advised (and therefore ill-advising) adviser that isn't grasping the legal difference between company and person. I know you can offset sole trader accounts for example and I think that the adviser is perhaps confusing this.Comment
-
Thread update
It appears that a mortgage provider does allow company funds to be offset - see Offset Mortgage | Commercial Lending | Norwich and Peterborough Building Society for more details. Having had a quick look at the application form no restriction appears to be placed on Ltds (which would interest a lot of people here) and assuming you have a decent set of records (>2/3 years) then you might be onto a winner.
Edit - almost certainly cannot be applied to personal purchases.Last edited by DigitalUser; 16 December 2012, 18:42.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment